Connect with us

Political

Democrats face make-or-break moment on shutdown, Dreamers

Published

on

201903295747.jpg

Continue to articles and other content

Cornyn along with deputy leaders – Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and Hoyer – go on to embark on immigration talks that Republicans are hopeful will yield an offer.

Cornyn said he spoke with McCarthy over the weekend and Durbin on Tuesday morning. Their staffs met again Tuesday afternoon with White House legislative affairs director Marc Short, who told reporters clearly there was some progress but declined to elaborate on details.

"We expect we\’ll avoid a shutdown," Short said. "It\’s important to avoid a shutdown."

Short did, however, express that the prospects of reaching an immigration deal recently were "fairly herculean."

\”It can\’t only be a binding agreement between six senators,\” Cornyn continued, referencing the bipartisan agreement Durbin and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) presented this morning that\’s dismissed by way of the White House. \”It really needs to be one will pass each house understanding that the president would sign with this particular sold on ensuring that we stay at it until look for a solution.\”

Short and White House chief of staff John Kelly need in order to meet together with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus on Wednesday morning. CHC members held some calls over the weekend to discuss strategy after which it released a statement seemingly versus the Graham-Durbin deal talk about the proposal by name.

But Democrats remain pessimistic which the band of No. 2 leaders can reach an agreement as well as some have said privately believe that the talks are an attempt by Republicans to stall on immigration to secure Democratic votes to help keep the costa rica government open.

Meanwhile, lawmakers in your house and Senate making the effort to position their competing bills since the baseline for negotiations, illustrating that members aren\’t even in agreement on how to focus immigration talks with all the government funding deadline just days away.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) challenged GOP leaders to have the bipartisan Senate bill to the floor for the vote, calling it the "last train leaving the station."

But a bipartisan band of House lawmakers held a competing news conference Tuesday, pushing a much narrower proposal. It may well address Dreamers and border security yet not touch the controversial areas of the Senate proposal, including changes to family-based migration and the diversity visa lottery.

The House bill, its 40-plus co-sponsors argue, is just narrow enough to win bipartisan support both in chambers without alienating key minority groups such as the Senate plan, for example the CHC, from the Jan. 19 funding deadline.

"Let\’s begin with something that\’s narrow. Let\’s begin with whatever everybody agrees on," said Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas), a significant co-sponsor. "We haven\’t seen a bill that\’s got 218 votes or 60 [votes from the Senate], however is one area that is the foundation to make upon."

Party leaders for both sides on the aisle understand the House proposal but did not endorsed niche.

House Democratic leaders haven\’t said what sort of caucus will vote on another short-term spending bill but privately aides said they expect the caucus to check out a strategy a lot like anything they did in December. House Democrats opposed the proposal until Republicans offered enough votes to give — and then some vulnerable Democratic front-liners were able to vote for.

Democratic leaders have remained steadfast within their unwillingness to strike a long-term budget accord with Republicans until DACA is resolved. Nevertheless they – particularly Senate Democrats – were not wanting to withhold votes for temporary funding measures keeping the federal government open.

Eighteen Senate Democrats voted for just a so-called continuing resolution last December, kicking the deadline to Jan. 19. Democratic leaders and centrists fear will have them blamed for shuttering federal agencies – which President Donald Trump\’s accusation that they\’re accomplishing this to shield undocumented immigrants will backfire.

Still, one senator who voted in favor of the stopgap funding measure in December – independent Sen. Angus King of Maine – signaled that he or she could switch, and not necessarily over immigration.

"I haven\’t decided. That\’s not me inclined to support one," King said within a brief interview. "We must start doing budgets."

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) also declined to agree to voting for that stopgap spending bill this week that didn\’t address his key priorities, citing community health centers as opposed to DACA. Any funding bill "is required to have" those priorities included, he told reporters.

Of course, GOP leaders have a their unique internal tensions. House Republican sources say they currently do not have the 218 votes to bring a short-term spending measure on their own.

Defense hawks from the party are furious that leaders still haven\’t reach an allowance accord to improve Pentagon funding and get threatened to vote from the measure and not using a long-term funding deal that can offer stability for any military.

House Armed Services Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) told reporters Tuesday he thought congressional leaders could reach a spending caps deal the minute today. But Democratic leaders demonstrate no want to strike a long-term funding agreement until DACA is resolved – and may face an intraparty revolt when they were to do it.

"Frankly, I do think it isn\’t really a lot of work to acquire a DACA deal, nonetheless the question for you is will they prefer to?" Thornberry said.

If Ryan can\’t muscle the votes from his own party, he\’ll need to utilize Democrats. One option being considered includes attaching long-term funding to your Children\’s Medical insurance Program – an addition that would theoretically entice some House Democrats, particularly Congressional Black Caucus members, to vote for into your market.

In December, when GOP leaders attached a short-term CHIP provision towards stopgap bill funding the government through Jan. 19, some Democrats privately hated voting contrary to the measure.

It\’s unclear, however, perhaps the president\’s recent comments about African nations and Haiti being \”shithole\” countries will vary that calculus. CBC members have discussed censuring obama for everyone remarks, and also over the weekend, civil rights icon Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) blasted obama for which he called racist remarks.

House GOP leaders are considering including delays of varied Obamacare taxes inside of a stopgap bill from a bid to make an impression on reluctant Republicans.

Should the continuing resolution clear the House, it would face an uphill battle inside the Senate, where nine Senate Democrats are necessary for passage.

But lawmakers will still be hopeful an offer is going to be reached by Friday.

\”I don\’t believe there\’s usually a shutdown,\” Cornyn said. \”I reckon that would be a big mistake.\”

Connor O\’Brien and Elana Schor resulted in this report.

Political

Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark

Published

on

By

201903295728.jpg

Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

Story Continued Below

At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

\”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

\”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

Continue Reading

Political

Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million

Published

on

By

201903295730.jpg

House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

Story Continued Below

The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

"This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

Continue Reading

Political

Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday

Published

on

By

201903295733.jpg

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

"The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

Story Continued Below

Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

"There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

"There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

"Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2019 Betrose.com