Connect with us

Political

Trump's credibility crisis on Capitol Hill

Published

on

201903295723.jpg

Continue to content

It demonstrates again to Democrats – and Republicans – that Trump is an unpredictable, unreliable partner who can not be trusted to keep his word. To lawmakers on Capitol Hill, there may be no greater crime, since all members and senators know their word is bond. As you lose that credibility, you\’re done for a deal-maker.

\”It seems the president has just two means of negotiating,\” Schumer said Tuesday. \”Either he commits into a deal at some point after which it betrays his word the next, that\’s what went down in 2009 after Leader Pelosi so i met together with the president on DACA, or he even dismissed the potential for an agreement and says a bipartisan deal is he gets everything he wants.\”

Durbin, as knowledgeable anyone within the Senate on immigration, was stunned by Trump\’s reversal.

\”He\’s never done a bipartisan deal as president. … That maybe what I think whenever i called him Thursday morning: You still have it, buddy!\” Durbin said within an interview. \”What he said to me is, \’I\’m not about to let anybody slow walk it.\’ That\’s exactly what he said.\”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who attempt to sell obama around the Dreamers deal, was plainly discouraged.

\”You can\’t fix this trouble without the presence of president,\” Graham said within the interview. \”I think performing [want a deal]. – He\’s poorly with his staff. I do believe that the guy [last] Tuesday was contrary 180 degrees distinctive from he I saw Thursday. I feel it\’s staff.\”

But blaming Trump\’s staff was Graham\’s strategy for pulling his punches, since Trump\’s position on the Dreamers issue may very well be changed only when obama himself were happy to switch it.

Trump\’s apparent change of heart within the Dreamers agreement reached by Durbin and Graham could be the president\’s only chance at the moment for the momentum-changing reach along the aisle on the signature issue. And lawmakers know they are able to go only to date without him.

\”There\’s going to need to be described as a specific plan the fact that president approves of before Sen. McConnell puts it in the grass,\” said Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who will be mixed up in the \”Twos Group\” of deputy leaders in order to obtain an immigration compromise.

With just 3 days to move prior to the govt has no money, there\’s a simple big issue whether Trump and GOP congressional leaders can muster the support of enough Republicans to avoid a shutdown. Democrats appear able to stand aside – as a minimum in the House – to observe if the GOP majority can govern without attention.

\”The reason There\’s no doubt that the prospect of a shutdown increased is because obama, between Tuesday and Thursday of a week ago, was very erratic of what he was and wasn\’t prepared to embrace and do, even for a topic where he himself convened the meeting,\” said Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.).

There\’s also more problems for Trump. Following partisan battles of 2017, wherein Trump and Republicans pushed using a Supreme Court nomination by changing Senate rules; neglected to repeal Obamacare owing to GOP opposition; and rammed via a $1 trillion tax cut which has no Democratic votes, his legislative agenda for 2018 currently is in tatters. Which is just 10 days after Trump declared he hoped at the moment might be distinctive from one more.

\”We hope that we\’re probably going to be able to work out an arrangement when using the Democrats. It\’s something, certainly, that I want to see happen,\” Trump said on a Jan. 6 news conference following his recent GOP-only Camp David retreat.

With Trump shifting his policy positions just like a change of garments and lashing out at lawmakers for carrying a political position he previously recently supported, lawmakers voice it out becomes difficult or impossible to barter.

\”For bipartisanship, you will need to go through same position for over a couple hours,\” said Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, a Democrat who offers praise Bob Dole in a floor speech soon. He stated ad units Republican Senate leader "was effective because he will help keep Republicans and Democrats together and he always kept his word. I feel about him a good deal today.\”

During a Senate hearing with Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, Graham openly showed his very own frustration with Trump.

Graham has worked difficult to generate a relationship with Trump after clashing with him within the South Carolinian\’s short-lived presidential campaign. He and Durbin thought there were an agreement with Trump, to begin to see the rug served from underneath them.

"What actually transpired between 10 and 12?" Graham asked of Thursday\’s about-face by Trump. "[Earlier] Tuesday, there were a president i was proud to golf with, call my buddy, who understood immigration had to be bipartisan, you possessed to own border security as essential, you have border security which includes a wall, but vehicles understood the concept we were treated to to accomplish it with compassion. Right after where that guy went. I\’d like to see him back."

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who may have had to endure Trump\’s skittishness firsthand, went to the ground on Tuesday calling the threat on the shutdown \”a manufactured crisis.\” McConnell cited a federal judge\’s ruling preventing Trump from shutting down the DACA program, at least temporarily, as a reasonable reason to protect yourself from a government shutdown on Friday, when funding ends.

\”Now which a federal judge has issued a nationwide injunction preventing the administration from winding over the Obama administration\’s DACA program, it really is clear that Congress has at least until March – at the least, even a lot longer – to arrive at a compromise that resolves the DACA question and also strengthens our security and makes other needed reforms to your broken immigration system,\” McConnell said.

\”I am positive that senators for both sides on the aisle will elect to avoid a manufactured crisis, reach a bipartisan funding agreement from the future, after which you can continue our negotiations of these important areas.\”

Political

Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark

Published

on

By

201903295728.jpg

Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

Story Continued Below

At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

\”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

\”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

Continue Reading

Political

Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million

Published

on

By

201903295730.jpg

House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

Story Continued Below

The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

"This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

Continue Reading

Political

Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday

Published

on

By

201903295733.jpg

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

"The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

Story Continued Below

Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

"There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

"There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

"Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2019 Betrose.com