Connect with us


Flake rankles fellow Republicans with Trump takedowns




Continue to articles and reviews

Asked whether he had ever rebut Flake on the Senate floor, Inhofe scoffed: \”That could possibly have the reverse effect and embolden him.\”

The long-running fight between Flake and Trump carries political and policy implications: Flake belongs to a bipartisan number of senators attempting to negotiate an agreement to cover some young immigrants, an idea that Trump opposes, for now. And Flake\’s words are reverberating round the Arizona primary race in order to change him. Former state Sen. Kelli Ward immediately called on everybody in the race to condemn Flake\’s \”disturbing speech.\”

Flake said afterward he didn\’t expect Republicans to come rushing to his position, and openly admitted that they managed to confront Trump so directly only because he is not seeking reelection. But the first-term senator said no GOP senators had attempt to dissuade him from giving the speech, all the while he faced questions from reporters about whether he thought Trump was really a \”despot\” with to elucidate days before he gave his speech that he wasn\’t, in fact, actually comparing Trump to Stalin.

\”\’The enemy from the people\’ is a loaded phrase, and an American president shouldn\’t put it to use,\” Flake said. \”Stalin was obviously a killer, therefore a united states president shouldn\’t use those phrases.\”

Even Flake\’s explanations of why he linked Trump when using the words of dictators and autocrats weren\’t enough for quite a few of his GOP colleagues, who said the Arizona Republican was going past the boundary in denouncing a president of his party around the Senate floor.

\”That\’s a little bit of hyperbole,\” said Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). \”Look, we must always be cautious because and we don\’t desire a chilling affect what remains of your legitimate press corps. A senator\’s words matter. So people, maybe, will need a much more heightened concern compared to what they should.\”

Though Flake is a rare instance of a Republican prepared challenge Trump, he\’s clearly not by yourself with those within the party pondering the condition of the media within the Trump era. Senators revealed that the fishing line between news and opinion had become too blurred, and so they disagreed with blanket attacks on reporters.

What Flake said, they do not: that Trump has brought media criticisms too far. Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said that Trump hasn\’t been too aggressive \”up up to now, i know of.\”

\”I don\’t even think in attacking the media – unless they\’re wrong on something,\” Hatch said. \”I just do not believe that\’s our job.\”

And though Flake created bigger public splash by focusing his speech and media appearances on Trump, Republicans said the senator concentrated too much on a political rival and weak hands about the problem that shows Americans trust the media not as much as ever. He could have mentioned President Barack Obama\’s attitude toward conservative media, said Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.).

\”I concur with Sen. Flake within the great need of protecting the significance of the main Amendment,\” Daines said. \”Sen. Flake discusses the power of trust. That cuts two ways. Once we had The president, he explained folks who watch Fox News take any presctiption another planet.\”

Minutes after delivering his latest scathing rebuke on the president, Flake said he hopes fellow Republicans will come around to his position, and Sen. John McCain (R.-Ariz.) did within the op-ed defending this news media. But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell plus a variety of other Republicans didn\’t even take note of Flake.

Even Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), another retiring Trump critic, seemed unenthused about rejoining the fray after calling the White House an \”adult daycare\” this past year and tussling with Trump repeatedly.

\”I don\’t know what else I can possibly point out that could be edifying to anyone,\” Corker said.

Instead, the loudest praise began Democrats like Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), who called Flake\’s speech \”genuine\” and \”critical\” for that Senate given Trump\’s promises to give \”fake news awards.\” In actual fact, Flake said he\’d been thinking for a long period about giving a speech about Trump\’s antagonism toward the press, and Trump\’s offers dish out the awards on Wednesday accelerated them.

\”I\’ve been considering it for quit some time,\” Flake said. \”Because in 2009 weren\’t a good year for truth. So if we really do not have shared truths to be a country, only then do we happen to be in trouble.\”

By get rid of Wednesday, Trump had yet to respond to Flake – but Trump did deliver his fake news awards on Wednesday night after some delay.

Nolan McCaskill caused this report.


Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

Story Continued Below

At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

\”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for “creative” strategies to force one.

Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

\”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

Continue Reading


Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

Story Continued Below

The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

"This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

Continue Reading


Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

"The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

Story Continued Below

Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

"There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

"There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

"Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2019