Connect with us

Political

Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark

Published

on

201903295728.jpg

Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

Story Continued Below

At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

\”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

\”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

Political

Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million

Published

on

By

201903295730.jpg

House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

Story Continued Below

The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

"This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

Continue Reading

Political

Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday

Published

on

By

201903295733.jpg

Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

"The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

Story Continued Below

Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

"There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

"There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

"Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

Continue Reading

Political

Democrats offer the line as GOP scrambles to avoid shutdown

Published

on

By

201903295734.jpg

House Democrats are holding firm versus a short-term spending bill, even while Republicans in chambers fight to locate enough votes to have the us government open beyond Friday.

House Democratic leaders have been preaching some text of unity with their members all week, emphasizing that sticking together could be the biggest leverage point out force Republicans into serious negotiations to defend Dreamers.

Story Continued Below

"This can be like offering you a bowl of doggy doo, convey a cherry over the top and called it chocolate sundae," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), mentioning the GOP spending bill, told reporters Thursday.

Lawmakers stop at an impasse over the fate from the roughly 700,000 young undocumented immigrants facing deportation, with enough members within chambers threatening to withhold their votes over a spending bill that a government shutdown is an extremely real possibility.

\”We\’ve had sufficient time to pay the Dreamers; its time,\” said Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), whose northern Virginia district is heavily populated with government employees.

Connolly said because of the demographics of his district, yet prefer the continuing resolution on condition that he were the \”last vote standing\” from a government shutdown or otherwise not.

A significant number of Senate Democrats have publicly said they\’re going to vote about the spending bill, upping it is likely with the first government shutdown since 2013.

House Democrats say they\’re aware of the way the vote affects their colleagues from the Senate. If many House Democrats supported the spending bill – even though Republicans had enough votes to feed the measure – that can cause it to tougher for Senate Democrats to stand firm for their opposition.

\”I think problems in later life the connections forwards and backwards; they may not be separate standalone actions,\” Connolly said. \”What we do here does have an impression there, and what they certainly there does offer an impact. And then we need to be mindful of that.\”

About a number of vulnerable Democrats voted for the last two stopgap funding bills in December – only after Republicans had enough votes for passage.

Now Democratic aides say they cannot expect a large number of members to cross the aisle if Republicans gather 218 votes, saying even vulnerable members are livid that GOP leaders look like they\’re stalling on immigration talks.

Republicans had hoped adding some policy riders into the stopgap spending bill – particularly a long-term reauthorization on the Children\’s Medical insurance Program – would woo enough Democrats to compliment the bill to make sure passage.

As of Thursday afternoon, the 194-member Democratic Caucus is focused on holding together in opposition as Republicans double- and triple-check their whip count before an expected vote later Thursday.

Multiple lawmakers said a tweet from President Mr . trump on Thursday morning questioning why a reauthorization of funding for CHIP was connected short-term bill.

\”They were assuming that was obviously a sweetener to acquire Democratic support,\” Connolly said of House GOP leaders. \”And the president recently given Democrats the talking point needed. Well, we go along with the president.\”

Meanwhile, Democrats still exert private and public pressure on Republicans to barter on immigration.

Pelosi called Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) the 2009 week and urged him to bring two immigration bills towards floor for any vote – a hard-line conservative measure sponsored by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and also a bipartisan proposal from Reps. Will Hurd (R-Texas) and Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.).

Democrats think the Goodlatte bill would fail on the floor as you move the Hurd-Aguilar proposal, which includes much more than 50 bipartisan cosponsors, could pass. Persons in your house Freedom Caucus are also pushing Ryan to create the Goodlatte bill up for any vote, threatening to withhold their votes to get a spending bill if he doesn\’t accomplish this.

Ryan replied to Pelosi\’s request by saying he \”couldn\’t try this,\” depending on two Democratic sources. Ryan\’s office could not reply to a acquire comment.

Separately, the deputy leaders inside the house and Senate – Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas), Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) – will huddle again on immigration Thursday afternoon.

The group met Wednesday with White House chief of staff John Kelly, but lawmakers made little progress inside talks. The Thursday meeting will focus specifically on Dreamers, according to an origin with information about the plans, rather than one other policy changes in mind, including border security.

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen will even attend Thursday\’s meeting.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2019 Betrose.com