Connect with us


Suncor doubles documented on oilsands, but seeks to extend contact with North Sea




CALGARY – Suncor Energy Inc. doubled down on its Syncrude oilsands stake with another $920 million for Mocal Energy Ltd.’s five per-cent fascination with the work. But hidden from the company pr release was the announcement of a small but significant deal to obtain a stake within a North Sea project, underscoring CEO Steve Williams’ recent comments of deploying capital in other jurisdictions.

Canada’s largest energy company by market cap boosted its stake during the Syncrude oilsands mine and upgrader to 58.74 per-cent inside a three way partnership including Imperial Oil Ltd., and Chinese companies Sinopec Oilsands Partnership and Nexen Oilsands Partnership.

Suncor now owns around 555,590 barrels on a daily basis of oilsands upgrading capacity, which makes its the single largest Canadian producer of synthetic crude oil, according to S&P Global Ratings.

Japanese firm Mocal Energy’s divestment also marks the departure of one more international oil company from your oilsands. In past times few years, ConocoPhillips, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Total SA and Statoil have sold any largest part of their Alberta assets, primarily to Canadian operators.

But for Suncor, the sale was a ‘no brainer’, simply because it already owned nearly 54 per-cent of Syncrude and “has additionally increasingly deploying their particular personnel” into the project, according to Barclays analyst Paul Cheng.

“The purchase price also compares favourably for the company’s last buying a 5 per cent interest from (Murphy Oil Corp.) for $937 million, announced in Apr. 2019 – that’s on the bottom in the crude price cycle,” Cheng wrote.

The Barclays analyst boosted his price target on Suncor stock from $52 to $54 per share, following announcement of the two deals.

While considerably smaller, Suncor’s $68 million deal to buy in to a prospective oil project offshore Norway called Fenja, is often a key to diversify on the oilsands.

“For our own international offshore, it’s about leveraging our long-life, low-decline assets we’ve inside the oilsands that has a highly profitable focused offshore business in geographic regions where finances assets and expertise,” Suncor spokesperson Sneh Seetal said Monday.

She said more deals offshore Norway and offshore U.K. could be a fit given those qualifiers. “We’d be evaluating any sexual chances to examine if they’d turn into a strategic match our portfolio,” Seetal said.

Suncor aims to pay out $280 million in capital around the project, within its 17.5 % stake in U.K.-based Faroe Petroleum plc’s stake from the Faroe offshore field, which has been discovered in 2019 and is likely to be producing oil by 2021.

The Fenja deal marks Suncor’s first international acquisition since 2019, once it heats up acquired a stake in the offshore U.K. project called Rosebank, operated by Chevron Corp. That project has yet to be sanctioned but predicted to generate 100,000 barrels of oil each day and 80 million cubic feet of gas main everyday.

In recent times, selling off assets in Trinidad and Tobago, while the company’s Middle East ventures have soured, using its Syrian and Libyan assets deemed too dangerous to produce safely.

Suncor president and CEO Steve Williams said for an earnings call last week that Suncor would think about employing its earnings from your oilsands to help make acquisitions. The provider had about $2.7 billion of funding accessible after December, in line with S&P.

Williams also said the organization may not sanction new major projects in Canada without governments easing the regulatory and tax burden on companies, which he said had made Canada uncompetitive.

“We’re needing to look at Canada quite hard. The cumulative impact of regulation far better taxation than other jurisdictions is making Canada a much more difficult jurisdiction to allocate capital in,” Williams said.

“Absent some changes but some improvement in competition, you’re going to see us not exercising the very big capital projects that we’ve just finished,” Williams said, speaking about the $17-billion Fort Hills oilsands project this company had just brought online.


U.S. stocks close at 14-month reduced in broad sell-off that shaved 500 points off of the Dow





U.S. equity indexes slid for their lowest near the coast 14 months as investors weighed the outcome with the Federal Reserve on development in an economy already anxious over trade, geopolitical tensions along with a possible government shutdown.

The S&P 500 Index finished Monday’s session its minimum level since October 2019. We now have, health-care and consumer sectors led the rout, but no segment of the benchmark went unscathed. Insurance stocks plunged following a court ruling jeopardized Obamacare, while Johnson & Johnson sank on fresh worries its asbestos scandal will intensify.

At one thing, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 600 points. The Russell 2000 Index of smaller companies entered a bear market. The dollar dropped, while Treasuries gained. West Texas crude settled below US$50 in my ballet shoes since October 2019 as glut fears grew.

Investors is going to be scrutinizing the Fed’s statement Wednesday, and also Jerome Powell’s news conference, for clues as to its intentions for 2019. One market observer has recently weighed in: President Mr . trump tweeted Monday it\’s “incredible” the central bank was considering an interest rate hike, given low inflation including a strong dollar.

“Trading stocks and shares, notably, is very at risk of all these speculations concerning what’s taking, politically what’s taking place , outside our borders, who’s tweeting what, just what the Fed’s planning to do on Wednesday,” Terri Spath, chief investment officer at Sierra Mutual Funds, told Bloomberg TV.

Global growth forecasts for the coming year are going to be trimmed as the trade war between biggest economies bites and markets reel with a volatile 2018. Meanwhile, political uncertainty still grips investors. You will find yet more personnel changes inside Trump administration and confusion remains over Britain’s future relationship with all the Eu.

U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke leaves at the conclusion of the season amid a swirl of federal investigations. Investors could keep monitoring Brexit developments after Theresa May’s team pushed back against reports they\’re warming to your second referendum.

Retailers led declines while in the Stoxx Europe 600 Index as Asos Plc plunged after warning it really is Christmas shopping season got off to your disastrous start.

And these are the main moves in markets:


The S&P 500 Index fell 2.1 per cent from 4 p.m. Nyc time. The Stoxx Europe 600 Index dropped 1.1 per cent, the best fall in one week. The U.K.’s FTSE 100 Index fell 1.1 percent.


The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index declined 0.3 %. The euro rose 0.4 % to US$1.1346. The British pound jumped 0.3 per-cent to US$1.2615. Japan yen increased 0.6 % to 112.77 per dollar, the best in many more over a week.


The yield on 10-year Treasuries dipped three basis points to 2.86 %, the smallest in over the week. Germany’s 10-year yield gained not as much as one basis indicate 0.26 percent. Britain’s 10-year yield rose three basis suggests 1.266 per cent.


The Bloomberg Commodity Index dipped 1.2 % on the lowest in almost Eighteen months. West Texas intermediate crude declined 3.8 per-cent to US$49.28 a barrel. Gold climbed 0.6 per-cent to US$1,246.33 one ounce.

Continue Reading


New Fed chair Powell says U.S. economic outlook strong, signals gradual rate hikes in public areas debut





WASHINGTON — Fed Chairman Jerome Powell told Congress Tuesday how the outlook for any U.S. economy “remains strong” regardless of the recent stock game turbulence, keeping the central bank on target to gradually raise mortgage rates.

Making his first public comments as leader of the nation’s central bank, Powell depicted an economy that was gaining strength and stressed that they intended to continue with the method of loan rates set by his predecessor, Janet Yellen. The Fed boosted its benchmark rate 3 x this past year and contains signalled that this expects to increase rates another 3 times in 2018.

In his statement, Powell praised Yellen with the important contributions she made during her four years when the first woman to have the Fed. He said the 2 main had worked together to be sure “an easy leadership transition and give for continuity in monetary policy.”

Referring to the wild swings during the stock trading game that occurred earlier this month, Powell said the Fed does “not see these developments as weighing heavily within the outlook for economic activity, the labour market and inflation.”

Powell, who took office on Feb. 5, was tapped last November since the new Fed leader after President Mr . trump thought we would against offering Yellen an extra term. Powell, a Republican, continues to be to the Fed’s seven-member board since 2012.

The Fed has raised its policy rate with a quarter-point 5 times starting December 2019. Before then, it had kept its policy rate at the record low near zero for seven years in an attempt to help the country pass though the deepest recession since 1930s. Despite the presence of the latest hikes, the interest rate remains on a still-low 1.25 per cent to just one.Half. But various market rates, including loan rates, have begun rising in anticipation of further Fed rate increases.

Many economists believe the Fed, which last raised rates in December, will hike again at its next meeting in March but some analysts think the Fed could hike a lot more than 3 times this year, determined by what inflation does.

Investors have started to worry how the Fed might accelerate the interest rate of their credit tightening if inflation, that has been dormant for ages, starts show signs of accelerating. Recent market turmoil was triggered by using a propose that wages to your Calendar year ending in January had climbed within the fastest pace in eight years, raising concerns that inflation pressures may be growing.

In his comments, Powell did not express worries how the economy was commencing to overheat, stressing instead several developments showing economic strength.

“The robust marketplace should keep support increase household incomes and consumer spending, solid economic growth among our trading partners should result in further gains in U.S. exports and upbeat business sentiment and strong sales growth will likely keep boost business investment,” Powell said.

Some economists have raised concerns that recent moves with the Trump administration and Congress to improve economic growth through $1.5 trillion in tax cuts and increased government spending may cause the Fed to concern yourself overheating and inflation.

But Powell declared that the government’s fiscal policy was now “more stimulative,” which may aid to boost inflation, that is chronically lower in the past several years. He stated that this Fed expected inflation to relocate up this holiday season after which stabilize throughout the Fed’s 2 per-cent target.

Powell was delivering the Fed’s semi-annual monetary report and testimony to Congress, appearing ahead of the House Financial Services Committee additionally, the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday.

During her four years as Fed leader, Yellen often received a bad reception from Republicans in the House who believed the Fed, throughout the extraordinary measures before combat the 2008 overall economy plus the deep recession to come, had grown too powerful and too independent. To impose more control, House GOP lawmakers pushed legislation that will demand Fed to follow along with a selected monetary rule in setting interest levels.

Yellen objected, arguing how the economy was too complicated try using a single rule to put loan rates. Powell in addition has voiced his opposition to your strict monetary rule nevertheless in his testimony he noted how the Fed “routinely consults monetary policy rules” for guidelines in setting policy.

“Personally, I’ve found these rule prescriptions helpful,” he explained, while noting that careful judgments were still necessary in assessing the variables who go to the various rules.

Continue Reading


Side accounts could bring two life assurance giants to their knees





In a time better mortgage rates inside late 1990s, two predecessor companies of commercial Alliance Insurance and Financial Services Inc. and Manulife Financial Corp. issued life policies that allowed holders to purchase side accounts that guaranteed rates of as much as five percent and four percent, respectively.

These side accounts wouldn’t contain an explicit limit within the height and width of investment, meaning in today’s low-rate environment these are potentially lucrative for his or her holders and also a significant liability for that firms that wrote them.

At least three limited partnerships purchased such policies previously in Saskatchewan, one among only four Canadian provinces that let buying insurance policies off their original holders. These investors have been in court in Saskatoon to push the insurers to acknowledge their own.

If legal court decides in preference of the investors, two major Canadian insurance firms could incur significant costs and face “liquidation” in the worst-case scenario, in line with one expert witness.

The universal life plans you want were written in 1997 by Aetna Term life insurance Co. (subsequently acquired by Maritime Life Assurance Co., which, consequently, was acquired by Manulife in 2004) and 1999 by National Life Assurance Co. of Canada (acquired by Industrial Alliance in 2005).

Universal life policies give the twin important things about a death benefit as well as a methods for earn investment income for a tax-exempt basis while in the policy, thereby making a cash value that may be accessed before death, though Canada Revenue Agency imposes a restriction on the policy value to keep this tax-exempt status.

As it possibilities open to customers expanded to add in equity market-related index returns, the volatility with the policy values increased. This sometimes required insurers to send back funds to customers to stay within CRA limits, and then complete and ask the annual premium payment shortly thereafter.

The side account was introduced to be a means to fix this customer annoyance, according to company representatives inside their affidavits. Rather then sending cheques back and forth, the inside account acted to be a receptacle to the insurer to deposit excess funds in the evening CRA limit along with policyholders to prepay future premiums.

Most side accounts offered more limited investment options — frequently, for example, merely a daily interest account — as opposed to runners offered in the main policy account.

However, older policies from several insurers offered very attractive investment options inside side account, together with a renewable 10-year guaranteed investment account by using a fixed, unalterable rate significantly above home market rates.

That option caught the interest of Michael Hawkins, a self-described businessman, farmer and actuary exceeding 24 years of experience within the term life insurance industry, as well as officer within the general partner of Ituna Investment LP and Mosten Investment LP, the plaintiffs in case before the court.  

In 2007, shortly fater he began to consider policies, underwritten by credit-worthy insurers, that offered attractive guaranteed rates, no ability for the insurers to reduce them, without caps for the dimensions of permitted investment.

In 2009 and 2010, according to his affidavit, Hawkins brilliant partners found what they were seeking and Ituna and Mosten purchased the IA and Manulife policies.

Focusing their efforts over the most sought after IA policy, they gradually invested over $4 million (net of withdrawals) over 3 years, at close to five % (including bonus interest), before IA shut them down at the beginning of 2019 after an inside audit with the policy.

They were less successful with Manulife, which accepted only $10,000 in the side account in 2019 before returning their funds in 2019. After unsuccessful efforts to negotiate an “acceptable” degree of investment in the policies when using the insurers, Ituna and Mosten filed court applications last December to compel the insurers acknowledge their investments.

But company executives argue in affidavits that the side account can’t be used to hold funds that aren’t reasonably important for future life insurance premium payments, pointing to contract language that identifies balances as “premiums on deposit.”

Furthermore, they note, it had become never industry practice to the side account to be utilized for large investments, stating that commissions are not paid to brokers on balances inside the side account.

The investors counter that before choosing a policy the exact same enter in 2009, Ituna requested and received a schedule from IA illustrating a hypothetical $1-million investment in the inside account.

The insurers’ counsel in addition called on Nicholas Le Pan, occasion head with the Office from the Superintendent of Financial Institutions. In written testimony, he noted that if insurers were forced by way of the court’s decision to just accept large deposits in to the side account, they will contravene the Companies Act, which prohibits deposit taking.

However, reported by their own testimony, Industrial Alliance was missing measures in area to guard against deposit taking nor detect Ituna’s large investment.

Further, although the company’s automated system tracked and reported that this $4-million peak level represented almost 15,000 years’ in future premium payments over the underlying policy, its first transfer to manage the difficulty when detected in 2019 was not to come back the big deposit, but that will put additional deposits by Ituna towards a short-term, lower-rate option. All funds were eventually returned in September 2019 through IA’s counsel.

The third defence argument, furnished by an unbiased actuary, Oliver Wyman, asks the court to consider the system-wide impact with the court’s decision.

If investors are capable to place unlimited amounts earning five per cent, the insurers would, from a worst-case scenario, face unlimited and un-hedgable liabilities, are not ready to attract capital, and may also have to cease operations, which could obviously negatively impact other policyholders, insurers and society in particular.

Hawkins addressed that possibility in a affidavit, arguing that it wouldn’t be the better choice to be able to invest unlimited amounts because, “It may be in contrast to Ituna’s interests for Industrial Alliance in becoming insolvent or in any manner cannot pay its obligations …”

The cases raise interesting legal issues, particularly light of brand new Top court of Canada decisions in unrelated taxation cases.

In and both issued in 2019, a legal court severely limited the usage of “rectification” (termed “reformation” within the U.S.), an equitable remedy whereby a court orders a change in an itemized document to mirror exactly what it should have said to begin with.

Making the implied limit to the dimensions of investment in one side account actually explicit will be a loan application of your rectification remedy in this case. But which might be an even more remote possibility here.

“Normally the judge leans to your insured if you find any ambiguity inside the policy,” noted a Toronto-based lawyer not connected with the way it is who motivated to remain anonymous, for the reason that insurer has access to experts to help with drafting the policy and finished treating its contents.

A third insurer, BMO Life Assurance Co., is definitely the subject of a case in Estevan, Sask., stemmed from the identical investor group. Its policy carries a three percent guaranteed rate. However, because of the similarity in underlying issues, BMO Life will quickly join IA and ManuLife in seeking a common hearing on the three cases prior to when the Saskatoon court.

The Canadian Life and Medical care insurance Association in addition has weighed in, seeking intervenor status (recently granted) to bolster the arguments from the members, as well as clarify the deposit-taking legal problem for this is a.

A judge on Nov. 20 ruled the three cases will stay separate, but, given similarities in legalities, they will all be heard throughout the same five-day free trial in April 2018 by a common judge in Saskatoon.

Meanwhile, the plaintiffs may have found a fresh way to obtain potential profits. They recently brought a second action against BMO Life and Manulife, contending the insurers happen to be utilizing the tax-exempt test of these contracts for the incorrect date, resulting in the policies being fully taxable. They conisder that this could hand them over the authority to invest large amounts mainly account also.

Not surprisingly, it options provide a lot more attractive terms as opposed to inside side be the reason for these policies.

Industrial Alliance and BMO both declined comment citing the court proceedings underway. Manulife declined detailed comments for a similar reason, but reiterated its primary defence it can not accept interpretations or uses of its items that are regardless of their intents and purposes.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2019