Connect with us


Meet the robot-taxing, marijuana-legalizing, Jeremy Corbyn within the French left




PARIS – French left-wingers are fed up with being?in power.

That got?what it’s all about that 600,000 of those were sending Sunday when?they provided a little bit known former education minister?the widely used to win the left’s presidential nomination.

Benoit Hamon, who spent the last 2 yrs as the Socialist backbencher fighting his personal government, has very little chance for winning the presidency in May. However, neither will the runner-up in Sunday’s vote, former Prime Minister Manuel Valls, based on the latest?Ipsos poll.

Valls campaigned at a scrupulously realistic, some would say boring, platform of incremental change,?always touting the potential of a left-wing victory in May. In comparison, Hamon never suggested?victory and drew accusations that he was deliberately campaigning to not ever win by pitching far-out ideas like taxing robots, legalizing marijuana and paying all French people a 750 living wage.

The criticism rolled off Hamon’s back.

As the 49-year-old?explained late Sunday and Monday?morning, his goal is not really much to win the presidency relating to position himself for the big battle: Who becomes france left’s moral leader after defeat in May and is particularly therefore?ideally positioned to perform for any presidency in 2022.

Hamon had been christened as France’s response to Jeremy Corbyn, come to disrupt the left.

    “This is concerning evaluating the long run,” Hamon told France Inter radio Monday. “That is precisely what We are to put. This [result] demonstrates to you that you’ve a real aspire to turn the page.”

    Dreams, please

    Most likely, the page that Hamon brilliant supporters need to turn is the one about left-wing rule in France.

    As soon as Francois Hollande became president, left-wing voters expressed dismay at his so-called betrayal of socialist principles and embrace of free-market principles. Hamon, an ongoing socialist and one-time disciple of former Prime Minister Michel Rocard, eagerly joined along with the criticism and soon fell foul of your president and his prime minister, Valls.

    At the top President Hamon’s agenda is definitely the repeal of France’s Constitution.

    After crashing out of government in 2014, he joined the ranks of some 40 rebel socialists who voted against everything their government proposed for an additional 2 years.

    The stance won Hamon automobile for authenticity. Furthermore, it taught him that realism and the willingness to compromise were not considered desirable qualities by?a great deal of his electorate.

    They wanted ideas, debates and dreams – all of these Hamon provided in huge, all-you-can-eat helpings through the left-wing primary.

    At the top of the President Hamon’s agenda could be the repeal of France’s Constitution. The fifth Republic, that has existed since 1958, is substituted for a 6th Republic to which the president’s powers might be vastly curtailed: she or he is a great deal more accountable to parliament and could be limited to one particular, seven-year term in power.

    In Hamon’s 6th Republic, the “people” would enjoy vast new powers. Any petition signed by above 450,000 citizens?would force parliament to veto or examine a piece of legislation.

    President Hamon would then get moving proposing his personal reforms. His first act will be to repeal?a controversial labor reform and change it out with new legislation to which working time could be reduced to inside of the current 35-hour legal threshold (he’s?not per simply how much.)

    He would also make a universal 750 monthly “liberty” payment?”for all” as well as legalizing marijuana for you to tax revenue in the sale.

    Hamon, whose only private sector job was obviously a three-year stint when using the Ipsos polling agency, was forced over the campaign to understand that such measures might be expensive, costing up to?300 billion yearly.

    Revenue from?robot taxes and marijuana sales would largely cover the freedom payment.

    But he didn’t abandon them. Instead, he argued that revenue from?robot taxes?(calculated by attributing each robot worker an imagined salary and making their “employer” pay tax on that) and marijuana sales would largely cover the liberty payment. Whatever remained over is paid by tax increases but “only for the highest earners,” Hamon said.

    “It may not be done from day to the next, but it is realistic,” Hamon said on Europe 1 radio recently.

    Power for the (quite) youthful

    It’s a utopian program that did actually were custom-built for young leftist voters.

    Hamon’s campaign spokesman told Newsman that youth?were overrepresented at campaign rallies and “support parties” – after-work events organized in?bars and cafes around every TV debate. Footage from Hamon’s victory party confirmed arsenic intoxication mainly youthful supporters.

    “In this campaign, specially in the meetings, there was clearly loads of youth, a great deal of young professionals,” said Alexis Bachelay, a Socialist MP and Hamon spokesman. “We felt that Hamon’s rhetoric on daily life, on employment, on ecology, these are definitely issues that the younger generation experience first-hand, especially those who find themselves gonna say hello to the economy.”

    But Hamon’s machine can be less youthful than it looks. Depending on a failure by Harris Interactive from the primary’s 1.6 million voters, he was less well-liked by voters aged 18-24 than either Valls or former Industry Minister Arnaud Montebourg, who finished?in third place on Sunday. The first kind prime minister even edged out Hamon among voters aged 25-34, the poll showed.

    But Hamon found a surprisingly deep reservoir of votes among people aged 35-49.

    These “young professionals,” as his campaign means them, were identified as people that have a generational divide with France’s rulers.

    “Young professionals took hold with this election,” said Hamon on France Inter. “They thought to weigh in over the presidential election … They just do not want, i can understand them, to adhere to the principles of the game decided by generations of people who experienced full employment. They gotta have change.”

    Except the alteration Hamon is preaching about is very little change on top of government. It is alternation in the direction in the Socialist Party, from May.

    This article has become updated to improve the date in the start of Fifth Republic.


    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for “creative” strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading


    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading


    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019