Connect with us


Emmanuel Macron’s option to momentum




QUIMPER, France – At?slightly after 6 a.m. another morning, Emmanuel Macron had already inspected case after case of brill, gurnard, sea bass, monkfish and turbot available for purchase?within the market in the seaport of Le Guilvinec. France presidential candidate had found?the langoustine, shaken hands with fishermen and ship owners, asked pointed concerns their trade and promised he previously research their problems.

Then along came Brexit.

At a roundtable his staff had organized on the second day’s an offer holiday to Cornouaille, the western portion of Brittany, the former economy minister was meeting with representatives within the powerful local fishing industry. While discussing their concerns,?Jacques Pichon, their heads of fishing company La Houle, said Brexit was undoubtedly the main issue the sector?faced.

Others joined?in. The fear, the tutor said, could be that the U.K.’s split on the EU?would bring a finish to your Common Fisheries Policy, which grants them fishing rights?in British?waters.

“Brexit will not go mainly because Brexit cannot go well,” Macron replied. “But I’ll make [the fishing problem] a red line in this negotiations with the U.K.”

If he or she is elected president in May, that’s. And when France seems to convince its EU partners that fishing may be a topic worth fighting for instead of, as Pichon as well as others fear, a small component of?a wider deal.

Macron appears to be a common candidate?in a position to squeeze out Marine Le Pen over the far right?or?Francois Fillon on the right.

The Macron method was on full display?in Brittany a couple weeks ago: Decide to meet a targeted group with specific problems; browse the brief beforehand and are avalable prepared; once in the grass, listen intently and give the impression your audience helps you form a judgment.

    It helps him to third placed into the presidential race, depending on pollsters, as?large crowds cheer him on at rallies, defying pundits’ predictions inside the fall that his campaign would fizzle out within weeks.

    In just?a few days in Brittany, Macron visited a dairy farm, a transport company, the fish market along with a pork producer (Brittany is, in the end, home to more than two-thirds on the 13 million roughly French pigs).

    Europe developed at every stop. Every time, Macron repeated his well-honed mantra he sees?Europe “not because?problem, but because the answer.”

    It makes him an exceptional beast: a?French politician getting applause for promoting European integration.

    Bubble unburst

    The Macron “bubble,” which Socialist and conservative opponents predicted would burst before Christmas, does no such thing. Macron featuring such momentum that they?can be considered the sole candidate?in the position to squeeze out either the far-right’s Marine Le Pen or?mainstream conservative Francois Fillon, the favorites to make it to your second round within the presidential election on May 7.

    If anything, his chances have improved following the first round of your Socialist presidential primary Sunday, which saw leftist?Benoit Hamon also come in way in front of center-left former Pm Manuel Valls.

    Opponents?are incredibly worried they’ve already began to set their sights on Macron.

    The Fillon campaign is definitely within the attack, hoping to make the former economy minister partly answerable for what within the unpopular outgoing president, Francois Hollande.

    Fillon has thus far refrained from speaking up himself, but he’s sent his underlings about the offensive. Pierre Danon, a retired businessman and senior Fillon adviser, penned an op-ed in Le Monde?describing Macron as a co-author of “policies of status quo and public debt” that led France “to bankruptcy.”

    As for Socialist Party officials, they first poured scorn on Macron for his “betrayal” of Hollande whilst resigned with the?cabinet last August. Certainly they begged him, in vain, to get familiar with the Socialist primary. And from now on these are openly debating whether or not to?support him if your chosen?Socialist candidate – either?Hamon or Valls – is unable to impress.

    Official Socialist backing hardly fills Macron with joy.?”I’m not seeking [the party’s] support


    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for “creative” strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading


    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading


    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019