Connect with us


Schulz’s departure liberates Parliament’s ‘dark prince’




Martin Schulz’s efforts to raise the profile of the European Parliament might have won him fans home in Germany, however the assembly’s civil servants – led by his compatriot Klaus Welle – are glad to find out the rear of him.

The former Parliament president’s tendency to centralize power on his office and direct resources to party groups rather than the civil service and individual MEPs thwarted Welle’s long-running campaign, as secretary-general on the European Parliament, to make it into an playing field of free-wheeling democracy?modeled within the U.S. Congress.

With Schulz’s departure to campaign to the German chancellorship plus the dissolution in the “grand coalition” between his Socialists & Democrats and Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker’s European People’s Party, Welle can get back to business as usual. He’s unlikely to become impeded by Schulz’s successor, Antonio Tajani, having promised to preside by using a gentler hand.

“Welle and Schulz clashed in the internal organization in the Parliament,” said Andrew Duff, a previous British MEP that has written extensively for the Parliament. “Tajani offers an easier partnership for Welle.”

Welle’s first focus will likely be institutional efficiency, improving offers to impose “performance indicators” on policymaking and streamline the internal organization. Colleagues said he previously had been deeply aggravated from Schulz’s insufficient interest and support.

There is concern in the corridors of your Parliament that Welle, as a possible avowed federalist, may be out of touch together with the anti-establishment, populist sentiment sweeping over the Continent.

Some a great deal more visible projects may also be over the agenda, together with a?major renovation and dear upgrade with the Paul-Henri Spaak building, the?oldest wing on the Parliament’s complex in Brussels.

Veteran officials in Parliament said Welle has wasted virtually no time since Schulz’s departure and has proposed several new hires for the cabinet of uncle and ally Tajani. “He has taken advantage now within the lack of coherence on the location where the House going,” said one long-standing Parliament official. “Welle is coming along whatever he wants. He could be clearly conditioning everything that is taking place.”

    Back to normal

    Welle makes obvious of his glee over Schulz’s departure. One Parliament official familiar with Welle’s thinking said the secretary-general viewed the election of Tajani for a triumph from the institution over its personalities. In Welle’s view, a victory for Tajani’s main opponent, Gianni Pittella within the S&D, would’ve yielded a likewise beneficial result.

    “It means the presidency of Martin Schulz was the exception for the rule and never the latest stage in development,” said a certified, describing Schulz’s charismatic leadership on the Parliament as the “phase” that is certainly now over.

    Philippe Lamberts, the Belgian MEP who leads the Greens group, said Schulz “wanted to pretend which the role of an European parliament president was highly political, but what determines the political dimension from the Parliament could be the plenaries, not obama.”

    By turning the European Parliament presidency election into a contest between Tajani and Pittella, MEPs effectively sent an email how they wanted to restore rights to rank-and-file MEPs – whorrrre elected by EU voters – and “return towards old normal.”

    However, you can’t say everyone while in the Parliament agrees with Welle’s focus on shoring increase the civil service, increasing its institutional expertise – one example is, he has crafted a parliamentary research service modelled after the Congressional Research Service in Washington – and switching the main focus to individual MEPs, potentially at the cost of transnational party groups.

    “If you push the Parliament towards a more Washingtonian model, you create more instability and you simply weaken the political groups,” said one senior Parliament official. “The more you destabilize the political groups, the more you push MEPs toward individualization, toward national interest.”

    Some officials say you can find concern while in the corridors from the Parliament that Welle, as being an avowed federalist, is far from touch with the anti-establishment, populist sentiment sweeping along the Continent. As context, it is said, his campaign to formulate the institutions, launch expensive renovation projects and invite MEPs to engage additional staff risk being “food with the populists.”

    “Who was stopping all his crazy projects regarding the reorganization with this house?” asked one official. “It was Martin Schulz. [Welle] has apparently taken them out of your closet because Schulz is fully gone, these types of Pharaonic projects.”

    Despite his discuss the Parliament for an institution, Welle – whose contract as secretary-general runs until 2019 – is not a career civil servant. He made his name as secretary-general within the EPP, now the largest political group in the Parliament, and is particularly credited with aggressively expanding the team to feature parties for example Silvio Berlusconi’s Forza Italia – which Tajani helped to found – in addition to conservative parties from Sweden, Finland and Austria.

    The expansion led the EPP beyond its traditional Christian Democrat base for making what the heck is currently the most effective political movement in Europe, which counts Juncker, European Council President Donald Tusk and Germany’s Angela Merkel as family.

    Schulz was catapulted for the Parliament presidency included in a power-sharing deal between his Socialists and the EPP, though in her first term he treated the post like a consolation prize for coming second in the election for Commission president in 2014. When Schulz did turn his focus running the Parliament, he treated it essentially for an arm of his “grand coalition” with Juncker, rubber stamping pre-agreed EU legislation.

    Tajani, as opposed, is anticipated to help with Welle’s administrative agenda “without interference,” depending on one long-standing Parliament official.

    Continue Reading
    Click to comment

    You must be logged in to post a comment Login

    Leave a Reply


    Cummings hospitalized as wife suspends campaign for governor





    Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) is currently hospitalized after a task to drain an infection, three sources told POLITICO, the most up-to-date setback inside of a string of medical issues which have plagued the longtime lawmaker since a year ago.

    Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, a Democratic policy consultant, suspended her gubernatorial bid in Maryland on Friday, shortly before news surfaced that her husband is at the hospital.

    Story Continued Below

    Soon after POLITICO first reported his hospitalization, Cummings\’ office released an argument saying his health problems were associated with a bacterial infection in the knee.

    "Doctors drained the infection in the minor procedure today. He\’s resting comfortably and expects the full recovery," his office said Friday.

    Cummings was hospitalized and sidelined for a lot of months not too long ago due to heart issues.

    In a press release announcing wants to suspend her campaign, Rockeymoore Cummings cited personal issues but wouldn\’t elaborate.

    \”Making an attractive and direct contribution towards state of Maryland also to our nation was my greatest motivating factor for getting into the public arena. Unfortunately, caused by personal considerations, We\’re suspending my bid for governor of Maryland,\” she said within an email to supporters.

    Multiple sources said Rockeymoore Cummings\’ decision to leave out the race was linked to her husband\’s health concerns. Democratic aides said Cummings was moving slowly ahead of the Christmas break.

    Cummings, 66, was hospitalized last May after what his office described back then as a \”minimally invasive\” heart valve replacement. He was scheduled to revisit work after that but ended up missing many months a result of a post-op infection that kept him clear of Capitol Hill until September.

    Upon his return, Cummings was noticeably slimmer and said he\’d have got to sustain a stricter diet and acquire more sleep. But he brushed aside any notion that he or she wasn\’t competent to fully perform his job.

    Cummings has represented his hometown Baltimore inside your home since 1996. He or she is well-liked and revered among all parties, even while he\’s sparred with Republicans over contentious issues for the reason that top Democrat over the House Oversight Committee.

    Rockeymoore Cummings was one among nine Democrats vying to unseat Republican Gov. Larry Hogan. She was endorsed by EMILY\’s List after she jumped within the race in October. But Rep. Cummings was the gubernatorial candidate\’s biggest single surrogate both publicly plus regards to fundraising. The congressman was listed as being a headliner a great upcoming fundraiser for Rockeymoore Cummings on Sunday.

    Despite the support with the prominent Democratic congressman, Rockeymoore Cummings wasn\’t the irrefutable front-runner however. At the beginning of polling of your Democratic primary, she trailed candidates including former NAACP President Ben Jealous and Prince George\’s County Executive Rushern Baker.

    Despite a considerable primary as well as general Democratic lean of Maryland, Democrats aren\’t as optimistic about unseating Hogan as they are about beating incumbent Republicans in states like Illinois, Boise state broncos, or Maine. That\’s largely because Hogan is popular: An October poll by Morning Consult listed him for the reason that governor while using the second-highest approval near your vicinity, behind only Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker.

    Continue Reading


    GOP senators recommend FBI probe of Trump 'dossier' author Steele





    Two Republican senators have recommended which the FBI pursue a criminal investigation against Christopher Steele – this writer of the disputed Trump-Russia dossier – for the purpose they described as evidence that they made false statements to federal investigators.

    "I cannot take lightly generating a referral for criminal investigation. But, because would with any credible proof a criminal offense unearthed while in our investigations, I\’m obliged to secure that information along on the Justice Department for appropriate review,\” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said in the joint statement with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

    Story Continued Below

    The senators did not provide public evidence to substantiate their request, nevertheless they noted they sent a "classified memorandum" to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray containing the foundation within their request.

    The request isn\’t going to measure the validity of your Steele dossier, nor can it constitute a criminal allegation. "The referral is made for further investigation only," according to the statement.

    Even so, Democrats quickly responded in anger.

    "I wasn\’t consulted concerning this referral nor were all of my Democratic colleagues," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the highest Democrat on Grassley\’s committee. "I do believe this referral is unfortunate since it\’s clearly another effort to deflect attention from what medicine committee\’s main concern: determining whether there is collusion regarding the Trump campaign and Russia to steer the election and whether there were subsequent obstruction of justice."

    One congressional aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the choice by Grassley and Graham to mention Steele towards Justice Department raises an obvious anomaly.

    "These are speaking about DOJ a justice based upon documents DOJ gave them and according to witness testimony into the DOJ," the aide said.

    Steele, an old British intelligence officer, was commissioned in 2016 by research firm Fusion GPS to research President Donald Trump\’s ties to Russia. The dossier he produced, which Trump has derided as fiction, describes a lot of illicit connections between Trump, his business and also the Kremlin.

    Republicans have persistently questioned how the FBI handled the dossier after receiving it in the 2016 campaign, including whether or not it formed the foundation of your surveillance warrant against a Trump campaign associate and whether the FBI independently verified any kind of Steele\’s information.

    Republicans in addition sounded the alarm over reports that Fusion was paid by the Clinton campaign for Steele\’s research, suggesting that Steele\’s work was the merchandise of your partisan smear effort.

    The two senators claim in their letter to obtain seen proof "potential violations" by Steele on the law prohibiting false statements to government officials. These potential violations, they assert, occurred "regarding his distribution of information contained in the dossier."

    Their letter was copied to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the highest Democrat to the Judiciary Committee, and Sens. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), the most notable lawmakers for the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Reps. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the top part lawmakers on the House Intelligence ommittee.

    Continue Reading


    DOJ clash with Trump allies hits Ryan's doorstep





    Continue to articles and reviews

    The two sources told POLITICO there was an endeavor by Ryan and DOJ leaders to reduce the temperature newest hostilities between the Justice Department and Trump allies in Congress. That group of House Republicans has railed against the department\’s leadership amid partisan questions its handling with the investigation into Trump campaign ties to Russia. Nunes had even threatened contempt citations against DOJ and FBI leaders should they failed to comply with his request.

    Still, this probably is not the end of it for Ryan. There are signs that Wednesday\’s agreement won\’t placate the GOP lawmakers most hostile toward the Justice Department. And therefore the speaker will probably be in the heart of ongoing run-ins between some of his hard-line members as well as DOJ as they quite simply fight over the definition of typically closely guarded documents – from surveillance warrants to evidence connected with ongoing investigations.

    Indeed, Ryan\’s attempt to help broker a truce suggests he\’ll be a central figure in resolving disputes that Democrats and several Republicans fear could erode public confidence inside justice system.

    On Thursday morning, just hours after the tentative détente, Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) requested Attorney General Jeff Sessions to be replaced unless he exerts with additional control in the FBI and produces documents Congress have been requesting.

    "It\’s time for Sessions to get started managing from a spirit of transparency to give doing this improper behavior to light and stop further violations," they wrote within a op-ed within the Washington Examiner.

    Though Ryan hasn\’t waded publicly into these fights, multiple GOP lawmakers repeat the speaker\’s attitude may be consistent: He firmly believes during the House\’s authority to conduct oversight with the Department of Justice and FBI.

    "Is know for Representatives carries a constitutional duty to workout oversight from the executive branch," said the spokeswoman, AshLee Strong. "The speaker always expects the administration to observe the House\’s oversight requests, and then he will support his chairmen when they get them to be."

    Rosenstein and Wray "wasted a visit to the Capitol," said one Republican lawmaker near the speaker. "Once Paul assures himself that this request is legitimate and there\’s grounds for it, he always backs the chairperson who requires it."

    Democrats have declared that the GOP attacks to the Justice Department – and Special Counsel Robert Mueller for example – really are a cynical try to protect Trump as investigations of his campaign\’s ties to Russia encroached upon his group of friends. The document requests and claims of bias, they\’ve argued, are aimed towards delegitimizing your research.

    Republican lawmakers themselves are divided about precisely how harsh an approach to take toward the FBI and Justice Department. But in interviews, some House lawmakers say Ryan has come across a unifying theme throughout the conference: transparency.

    "Paul Ryan can be an institutionalist," said Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), who\’s been being among the most aggressive critics of Justice Department leaders\’ handling of the Trump-Russia probe. "I really believe he shares our frustration using the loss of responsiveness."

    "Perhaps we have seen several different camps regarding how aggressive people must be … but those camps are typical coming together with one singular focus, which will come down on the medial side of needing more documents, more transparency," added another GOP lawmaker who requested anonymity to characterize conversations with colleagues.

    "I do believe there was clearly lots of division earlier, even so the more the GOP members uncover … greater careers aligning of investigative strategies and tactics," the lawmaker said.

    Ryan states little publicly over the matter since October, as he chided DOJ due to its refusal to cooperate with congressional investigators demanding more info about how exactly the FBI handled its Trump-Russia investigation.

    "As soon as the executive branch, in this situation, the FBI as well as DOJ are stonewalling or foot-dragging, making it harder for us to accomplish our obligation of conducting oversight about the executive branch," he vented within an interview with Reuters back then.

    Since then, some Trump loyalists inside the house have ratcheted up their complaints. First, they took concentrate on Mueller, who was simply tapped by Rosenstein in May to oversee the Trump-Russia investigation after the president fired FBI Director James Comey. Mueller\’s team, they complained, included officials who had donated to Democrats, they can said raised the specter of bias.

    That group of Republicans close with Trump – including Gaetz, Jordan, Meadows and Ron DeSantis – also pounced on reports that Mueller had removed a highly regarded agent from his team in July after learning of a few texting criticizing Trump that he had provided for a colleague.

    At once, even more traditional Republicans over the intelligence, judiciary and oversight panels also began more quietly question the FBI\’s tactics inside the Russia probe, though failed to allege bias or corruption necessarily. Recently, POLITICO also reported that Nunes and various Republicans about the House intelligence committee ended up perfecting a probe they assert could spotlight wrongdoing by top officials inside FBI.

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019