Connect with us

Political

5 takeaways through the May-Trump talks

Published

on

2019033136395.jpg

WASHINGTON – This was the instant Theresa May came in person when using the great American bear.

Donald Trump was courteous, calm and funny while he held his first press conference which has a world leader since becoming president – pulling faces, joking with reporters and repeatedly praising a “most special relationship” using the U.K., ticking a similar diplomatic box every U.S. leader feels compelled to tick.

He looked pleased as May announced the Queen had invited him to Britain later this holiday season. The happy couple had already bonded with a bust of Winston Churchill, returned for the Oval Office after an eight-year sojourn inside less photographed corridors of the White House.

And nevertheless president was defiantly, unmistakably himself. I thought this was no watered down Trump, tamed through the necessary office.

When May reaffirmed Britain’s resolve forpersistance to sanctions on Russia, Trump would not. When May announced the U.S. president was “100 percent” committed to NATO,?Trump muttered “true” but anything.

On torture, he repeated his view so it worked. On Brexit, he said it had been “fantastic” that Britain was finally “free and independent.” The U.K. pm smiled at all the right moments, and will also be satisfied with Trump’s warm words for Britain, however, this was uncomfortable stuff.

It is, however, her new reality. Over 48 hours inside the U.S., the U.K. prime minister has indelibly tied her fortunes to individuals of the new man within the White House.

    Here are five takeaways within the opening scene of this strangest of political romances.

    1) Trump are not to be tamed

    If May?stumbled on Washington interested in reassurances on key diplomatic differences,?Trump’s press conference performance must be chalked up as a loss.

    May were able to extract one concession – on NATO – but only just. There was no commitment on trade, notably warm words for Russia and praise for torture. In Britain’s eyes: Poor quality.

    In her opening remarks, May pulled something like a diplomatic fast one, shoehorning in Trump’s private reassurance about his persistence to the NATO military alliance. They needed to try this perhaps says more about Trump’s real feelings around the issue.

    When pressed by U.S. reporters about his thoughts about Russia, Trump was defiant. “If you can possess a great relationship with Russia and China sufficient reason for all countries I’m all for that. Whenever we can, that would be an optimistic.”

    He went further. If relations between Washington additionally, the Kremlin are as nice as those relating to the U.S. and U.K. that could be great, he stated.

    British prime ministers?aren’t familiar with hearing that. An exclusive relationship isn’t so special if people have one.

    2) Quiet menace

    “That was selection for any question? There goes that relationship!”

    This was Trump’s reaction to a humdinger of your question with the BBC’s Political Editor Laura Kuenssberg, who pointed out his controversial opinion of Muslims, abortion and torture weren’t exactly popular some parts of the U.K.

    Trump’s response was funny – but more so, perhaps, given that it contained some truth.

    Downing Street clearly believes Trump responds well to praise and carefully choreographed every element of this week’s day at the U.S. accordingly.

    May decided of her option to hail his “stunning” election victory, declaring her delight at having the capability to congratulate him personally.

    But for the upcoming 4 years it’s clear you can find will be many treading on diplomatic eggshells.

    Trump was clear in her view that America has been ripped off and hubby would be the strong leader it must stand up for itself again, whether Britain wants it or you cannot.

    3) A vassal state?

    As May attained the White House, driven past?a procession of yankee flags and greeted by way of the president over the steps of your West Wing, it had become?just like a regional governor okay Rome to greet the?new emperor.

    French presidential hopeful Emmanuel Macron reports May’s tour within the U.S. exposes Britain’s status like a “vassal” state of your U.S. empire.

    But May is not a pushover and was going to make it known, contradicting obama on Russian sanctions and insisting could not are put off by confrontation. The U.K. prime minister’s visit wasn’t any Washington sideshow either. The vast East Room in the White House was filled with U.S. and British reporters, camera crews and TV anchors.

    But the eye was clearly not really on?what May was required to say, so how this most unpredictable of politicians would definitely behave – and just what he was going to do about Mexico, Putin and China.

    The U.K. may get its special relationship with Trump, nonetheless it remains unclear whether it will possess affect his wider behavior.

    4) Symbolism matters

    As each leaders walked from the East Room press conference over the White House colonnade into the West Wing for supper, Trump took the British prime minister by hand, patting it slightly.

    The president is not likely to try out that with Vladimir Putin.

    May looked untroubled yet it’s unlikely to be the picture she would like beamed time for Britain. She wanted warm but businesslike. That was not it. Despite the fact that image,?the talks transpired well when using the British press:?”Trump blesses Britain,” said changes. “Love-in in the White House” was the Daily Mail’s first page headline.

    The personal chemistry between the two leaders is vital. Nevertheless the relationship between their top teams is practically as esential for a functional, day-to-day level.

    At the press conference every one of the main players were in the room.

    Steve Bannon, the president’s ideological inspiration, started in smiling and shaking hands wonderful May’s top team, including ambassador Kim Darroch, whom he seemed to know well.

    Kellyanne Conway, Trump’s campaign manager throughout his run for president, was second row back. Sean Spicer barked instructions before the two leaders emerged.

    The night before, May held a drinks reception along at the British ambassador’s residence, giving her a chance to speak privately mostly of Trump’s key cabinet appointments including Pentagon chief James “Mad Dog” Mattis and Wilbur Ross – a man who, as Trump’s nominee for commerce secretary, can help negotiate the U.K.-U.S. trade deal on which May has placed a lot credit.

    The two teams were also present on the White House talks Friday and for lunch together with the two leaders afterwards (they had blue cheese salad, beef shortribs with potato puree and winter vegetables and also a salted caramel creme br?lee).

    5) Mayism takes shape

    From ribs in Washington with one strongman leader to coffee in Ankara with another.

    Direct from talks with president Trump while in the White House, May jets overnight to Turkey for talks with President Recep Tayyip Erdo?an.

    What either man does domestically appears of little interest to May. On the flight over to the U.S. May was asked what she’d because of represent Britain’s Muslim community in talks with Trump. Her reply involved anything that she could do on their behalf in your house. Pressed on whether she’d a responsibility to represent British muslims, she shot back which she what food was in Washington to represent the many Britain.

    To May, it will be the national interest at the very least. Human rights can wait.

    In her speech to Republican leaders in Philadelphia Thursday she declared get rid of liberal interventionism. On Friday she declared Mexico’s failures of Trump a subject for Mexico and Trump and none of her business. On Saturday could begin deepening the connection with Erdo?an in spite of his increasingly authoritarian turn.

    In a world of strong men, turmoil, Brexit and Trump, Britain’s second female prime minister is prepared to work with whoever looks gonna make the U.K. more secure, from both terror and economic shocks.

    This article have been updated to clarify Donald Trump’s solution to Theresa May’s NATO comments.

    Political

    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark

    Published

    on

    By

    201903295728.jpg

    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading

    Political

    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million

    Published

    on

    By

    201903295730.jpg

    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading

    Political

    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday

    Published

    on

    By

    201903295733.jpg

    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading

    Trending

    Copyright © 2019 Betrose.com