Connect with us


Trump the bully




Writers have fracked the literary canon hunting for a personality who best resembles Donald Trump. Is he Richard III? Nah, Richard III was witty and Trump isn’t. Is he Willie Stark, the protagonist from Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men? Could possibly passing resemblance, but Willie became a drunk and also a life-long pol; Trump’s a teetotaler in office for the first time. Lonesome Rhodes from A Face inside the Crowd? Those great television demagoguery fits, but Rhodes never was a candidate. Bane from The Dark Knight Rises, whom Trump quoted within the inaugural speech? Or is Trump an amalgam of characters beyond Mark Twain?

My explorations within the canon for Trump’s literary antecedent sent me back to certainly one of the best writers, novelist Stanley Elkin. Elkin’s short story “A Poetics for Bullies” from your April 1965 issue of Esquire, that also appeared in her Criers and Kibitzers, Kibitzers and Criers collection, anticipated the irritable mental gestures (to pinch an expression) comprise the 45th president of america. The story’s protagonist is usually a high-schooler, perhaps an older middle-schooler, who passes by the name of Push the Bully, who introduces himself inside the first paragraph thusly:

I’m Push the bully, along with what I dispise are new kids and sissies, dumb kids and smart, rich kids, poor kids, kids who wear glasses, talk funny, showcase, patrol boys and wise guys and children who pass pencils and water the plants – and cripples, especially cripples. I like nobody loved.

Push’s reign of terror extends from physical punishment – “Did you notice a match burn twice?” – to swiping the game ball business kids to promising 6-year-olds a stick of gum after which abandoning them within an auditorium to endlessly pushing his method to first in line. Push can smell weakness on other occasions, so when performing, he exploits it. As he locates confidence in other people, he does his wise to undermine it. Even those who find themselves completely normal and unafflicted experience the ridicules of his expert mimicry.

Like Push’s insults, Trump’s insults must not be accurate to get.

Push doesn’t beat people up. He makes use of his drop by beat them down with insults and cruelties to cement his place in the pecking order – not unlike Mr . trump. Trump, you’ll recall, spackled the campaign trail with 1000s of insults for his opponents, media organizations, newscasters, government officials, reporters, celebrities, entire nations, a shopping district (Macy’s), NATO, protesters, Super Bowl 50, pollsters, businessmen plus much more. And that is certainly just counting his Twitter feed. Trump’s insults, often coarse, are sharpened by hand and tend to be usually tipped by the smear of dung to poison foes. While in the campaign he availed himself of your entire insult catalogue – Carly Fiorina’s looks, as an example, John Kasich’s dining manners, Jeb Bush’s “energy,” and Rick Perry’s IQ.

Like Push’s insults, Trump’s insults doesn’t have to be accurate to get. His insults exact damage by violating the typical comity that governs civilized life. Like a Hell’s Angel, Trump transgresses for any pure joy from it, and he gets away with it because few hold the will to descend to his level and retaliate. Marco Rubio made an effort to bully Trump back, calling him a con artist and mocking, we’re left to presume, the size of Trump’s wedding vegetables. Trump, unwounded, ate him alive, tweeting, “Lightweight Marco Rubio was making an effort a few days ago. The main problem is, they are a choker, and as soon as a choker, always a choker! Mr. Meltdown.” Rubio soon regretted the non-public slights, but his remorse was more to do with losing the schoolyard brawl than in regards to the stuff of his digs.

Even in victory, Trump continues the tormenting if you’re not the physical insults. CNN, he tweeted soon, is “FAKE NEWS,” and that is more a lie compared a taunt. Chelsea Manning can be an “Ungrateful TRAITOR.” Rep. John Lewis is “All talk, talk, talk – no action or results.”

    Like Push, Trump navigates by internal rancor. Unhappy in reference to his own humanity, he craves for he can’t have, that is our respect. “I wish I were tall, or fat, or thin,” Push says. “I wish I did different eyes, different hands, a mom in the supermarket. If only I were anyone, a compact boy, a gal within the choir. I am a coveter, a Boston Blackie from the heart, casing the globe.” Had Push been a proper person, Jeff Zucker will have hired him for hosting The Apprentice instead of Trump.

    In his book, Reading Stanley Elkin, Peter J. Bailey writes that Push defines himself “largely with regards to the spontaneous, gratuitous, irrational desires he feels but cannot gratify; he incessantly and obsessively needs to encompass more, have an overabundance, be than his paltry single share of existence allows him to encompass, have, be.” Push, like our new president, attacks the inadequacies of others because he’s super-aware of his personal. His hair color brilliant Dorito pores and skin are just the most visible manifestations of his self-loathing.

    Not to ruin the storyline in your case (SPOILER ALERT), but a whole new kid whose voice Push can’t mock, whose charisma he can’t tarnish, whose decency he cannot pollute upends him. The fresh kid can’t be physically bullied, either, and when Push sucker-punches him, he fights back and extends the hand of friendship to Push after throttling him. “Push just isn’t a lot dissatisfied as to what he or she is as angry in the least that they isn’t,” Bailey writes.

    Trump didn’t throw a Pushian punch at President Barack Obama if they met from the White House in November. But reviewing the playback quality excerpt from your session, you don’t need have read “A Poetic for Bullies” to sense that Obama’s bearing caused Trump to curb his bile. It isn’t that Obama is a Christ-child or that he’s safe from mimicry. But Trump has insulted – bullied – Obama repeatedly throughout the years, nevertheless lies plus the slights as well as the scorn haven’t found purchase with him the direction they did the Republican candidates or Hillary Clinton.

    I’m no Obama sentimentalist. I never voted for him. I threw bricks at him. I only observe here that Obama’s comportment had a technique for neutralizing Trump’s slights while still permitting him an extra chance fire in the buoyant manner. “Now, if somebody can’t handle a Twitter account, they won’t handle the nuclear codes,” Obama said in advance of the election after it had been reported that Republican staffers had removed Trump from his Twitter.

    Other ways of repelling Trump’s mean girlisms may exist, even so suspect I’m onto something here. In case the short story fits, Mr. President, read it.

    Jack Shafer is Newsman‘s senior media writer.


    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading


    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading


    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019