Connect with us


Trump the bully




Writers have fracked the literary canon hunting for a personality who best resembles Donald Trump. Is he Richard III? Nah, Richard III was witty and Trump isn’t. Is he Willie Stark, the protagonist from Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men? Could possibly passing resemblance, but Willie became a drunk and also a life-long pol; Trump’s a teetotaler in office for the first time. Lonesome Rhodes from A Face inside the Crowd? Those great television demagoguery fits, but Rhodes never was a candidate. Bane from The Dark Knight Rises, whom Trump quoted within the inaugural speech? Or is Trump an amalgam of characters beyond Mark Twain?

My explorations within the canon for Trump’s literary antecedent sent me back to certainly one of the best writers, novelist Stanley Elkin. Elkin’s short story “A Poetics for Bullies” from your April 1965 issue of Esquire, that also appeared in her Criers and Kibitzers, Kibitzers and Criers collection, anticipated the irritable mental gestures (to pinch an expression) comprise the 45th president of america. The story’s protagonist is usually a high-schooler, perhaps an older middle-schooler, who passes by the name of Push the Bully, who introduces himself inside the first paragraph thusly:

I’m Push the bully, along with what I dispise are new kids and sissies, dumb kids and smart, rich kids, poor kids, kids who wear glasses, talk funny, showcase, patrol boys and wise guys and children who pass pencils and water the plants – and cripples, especially cripples. I like nobody loved.

Push’s reign of terror extends from physical punishment – “Did you notice a match burn twice?” – to swiping the game ball business kids to promising 6-year-olds a stick of gum after which abandoning them within an auditorium to endlessly pushing his method to first in line. Push can smell weakness on other occasions, so when performing, he exploits it. As he locates confidence in other people, he does his wise to undermine it. Even those who find themselves completely normal and unafflicted experience the ridicules of his expert mimicry.

Like Push’s insults, Trump’s insults must not be accurate to get.

Push doesn’t beat people up. He makes use of his drop by beat them down with insults and cruelties to cement his place in the pecking order – not unlike Mr . trump. Trump, you’ll recall, spackled the campaign trail with 1000s of insults for his opponents, media organizations, newscasters, government officials, reporters, celebrities, entire nations, a shopping district (Macy’s), NATO, protesters, Super Bowl 50, pollsters, businessmen plus much more. And that is certainly just counting his Twitter feed. Trump’s insults, often coarse, are sharpened by hand and tend to be usually tipped by the smear of dung to poison foes. While in the campaign he availed himself of your entire insult catalogue – Carly Fiorina’s looks, as an example, John Kasich’s dining manners, Jeb Bush’s “energy,” and Rick Perry’s IQ.

Like Push’s insults, Trump’s insults doesn’t have to be accurate to get. His insults exact damage by violating the typical comity that governs civilized life. Like a Hell’s Angel, Trump transgresses for any pure joy from it, and he gets away with it because few hold the will to descend to his level and retaliate. Marco Rubio made an effort to bully Trump back, calling him a con artist and mocking, we’re left to presume, the size of Trump’s wedding vegetables. Trump, unwounded, ate him alive, tweeting, “Lightweight Marco Rubio was making an effort a few days ago. The main problem is, they are a choker, and as soon as a choker, always a choker! Mr. Meltdown.” Rubio soon regretted the non-public slights, but his remorse was more to do with losing the schoolyard brawl than in regards to the stuff of his digs.

Even in victory, Trump continues the tormenting if you’re not the physical insults. CNN, he tweeted soon, is “FAKE NEWS,” and that is more a lie compared a taunt. Chelsea Manning can be an “Ungrateful TRAITOR.” Rep. John Lewis is “All talk, talk, talk – no action or results.”

    Like Push, Trump navigates by internal rancor. Unhappy in reference to his own humanity, he craves for he can’t have, that is our respect. “I wish I were tall, or fat, or thin,” Push says. “I wish I did different eyes, different hands, a mom in the supermarket. If only I were anyone, a compact boy, a gal within the choir. I am a coveter, a Boston Blackie from the heart, casing the globe.” Had Push been a proper person, Jeff Zucker will have hired him for hosting The Apprentice instead of Trump.

    In his book, Reading Stanley Elkin, Peter J. Bailey writes that Push defines himself “largely with regards to the spontaneous, gratuitous, irrational desires he feels but cannot gratify; he incessantly and obsessively needs to encompass more, have an overabundance, be than his paltry single share of existence allows him to encompass, have, be.” Push, like our new president, attacks the inadequacies of others because he’s super-aware of his personal. His hair color brilliant Dorito pores and skin are just the most visible manifestations of his self-loathing.

    Not to ruin the storyline in your case (SPOILER ALERT), but a whole new kid whose voice Push can’t mock, whose charisma he can’t tarnish, whose decency he cannot pollute upends him. The fresh kid can’t be physically bullied, either, and when Push sucker-punches him, he fights back and extends the hand of friendship to Push after throttling him. “Push just isn’t a lot dissatisfied as to what he or she is as angry in the least that they isn’t,” Bailey writes.

    Trump didn’t throw a Pushian punch at President Barack Obama if they met from the White House in November. But reviewing the playback quality excerpt from your session, you don’t need have read “A Poetic for Bullies” to sense that Obama’s bearing caused Trump to curb his bile. It isn’t that Obama is a Christ-child or that he’s safe from mimicry. But Trump has insulted – bullied – Obama repeatedly throughout the years, nevertheless lies plus the slights as well as the scorn haven’t found purchase with him the direction they did the Republican candidates or Hillary Clinton.

    I’m no Obama sentimentalist. I never voted for him. I threw bricks at him. I only observe here that Obama’s comportment had a technique for neutralizing Trump’s slights while still permitting him an extra chance fire in the buoyant manner. “Now, if somebody can’t handle a Twitter account, they won’t handle the nuclear codes,” Obama said in advance of the election after it had been reported that Republican staffers had removed Trump from his Twitter.

    Other ways of repelling Trump’s mean girlisms may exist, even so suspect I’m onto something here. In case the short story fits, Mr. President, read it.

    Jack Shafer is Newsman‘s senior media writer.


    McConnell dances on Bannon's grave





    Continue to content

    \”Taking that counter-argument out of your game here clears the highway for just a very clear-eyed political technique of the season,\” said Scott Jennings, a Republican political strategist and former McConnell aide. \”Bannon will have dramatically complicated that.\”

    Jennings and various McConnell allies the party can consentrate on selling a still-unpopular tax law for the American public and picking up Senate seats in states President Donald Trump won in 2016. Towards the extent Bannon is blasting McConnell with his fantastic cohorts as corporate globalist sellouts, he\’ll be doing so as a much-diminished political force.

    The elation inside McConnell\’s camp weren\’t able to you have to be apparent. When McConnell assembled his leadership team on Wednesday for a new-year huddle, he focused first not on a looming government shutdown as well as recently-passed government tax bill – he celebrated Bannon\’s self-destruction.

    The president had released your firm stand out hours earlier disavowing Bannon, stating his former aide had "not only lost his job, he lost his mind" while he was fired. McConnell gleefully told his colleagues they had spoken together with the president moments earlier and told him: \”I couldn\’t have stated it better myself.\”

    But it\’s unclear how much of an aspect Bannon would\’ve gone through the nation\’s most acceptable Senate races, anyway. Several Republican vs. Republican battles will rage on without him.

    In just four months, a pair of Indiana GOP congressmen will settle their months-long clash inside a May 8 primary. A newly wide-open Republican field inside Ohio Senate race will be dependant in a few hours. Along with fierce primaries loom in Wisconsin, Nevada, West Virginia and elsewhere.

    Bannon\’s fall may deprive primary challengers of some oxygen and money. Nevertheless it doesn\’t change a main environment during which any tie to Washington or McConnell is usually poisonous.

    \”The Republican Congress has replaced Obama because bogeyman for conservative GOP primary voters," Senate Leadership Fund President Steven Law wrote after Moore beat then-Sen. Luther Strange in Alabama\’s Republican primary.

    Still, Josh Holmes, a highly regarded McConnell political lieutenant who\’s spent most of the autumn and winter on the warpath against Bannon, said the president\’s decision to toss Bannon aside will freshly unity the party\’s efforts.

    \”It repairs a divide that existed only owing to Steve Bannon,\” he was quoted saying. \”The party has largely been united – House, Senate, administration – and features been executing quite well since Bannon\’s departure from your White House. One exception fot it has long been Bannon\’s activities on the outside of.\”

    A Bannon spokesman didn\’t reply to a request comment.

    The majority leader will expend the weekend with the president and Republican congressional leaders at Camp David. He\’ll almost certainly stress for the group value of party unity, an idea inimical to Bannon\’s project to remake the GOP in their populist-nationalist image.

    McConnell, depending on two sources knowledgeable about his plans, will lie down his look at just what it normally takes for Republicans to reach the 2011 treacherous political atmosphere. Namely, a relentless look at selling tax reform because engine behind the booming economy.

    The hope of McConnell along with his allies at Senate Leadership Fund along with the National Republican Senatorial Committee is that often tax reform, along with the confirmation of conservative judges, can continue a restive GOP base from tossing two incumbents facing strong primary challenges. In Nevada, Sen. Dean Heller began airing ads in November. In Mississippi, Sen. Roger Wicker started airing spots right in front of Christmas. Both men face actual or expected Republican challengers.

    \”It\’s been a large year in Washington,\” Wicker says in the ad, since he sits with his wife before a Christmas tree. \”We\’ve delivered pro-growth tax cuts, confirmed conservative judges – probably the most throughout history – and slashed billions in job-killing regulations.\”

    Heller expires against businessman and perennial candidate Danny Tarkanian, who have won multiple GOP House primaries this decade. Wicker is likely to face state Sen. Chris McDaniel, who narrowly lost to Sen. Thad Cochran in 2014. Mainstream Republicans take both challengers seriously, and Bannon was set to back both Tarkanian and McDaniel.

    They\’ll now sure enough have to carry out without Bannon\’s expansive media presence and whatever funding he would\’ve gotten to generate from donors.

    But simply how much Bannon mattered in both races isn\’t certain. As they was hoping to build a political group, its funding sources and staffing were in the air. While Bannon had wants to run primary opponents against every GOP senator up for reelection except Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, the Breitbart chief was can not recruit challengers practically in most states.

    And as the limited public polling available shows Tarkanian giving Heller a race, Wicker provides a substantial lead over McDaniel.

    Former state Sen. Kelli Ward, a Bannon-backed candidate in Arizona, did play a role in chasing Sen. Jeff Flake into retirement. But she will be likely going to face establishment-backed Rep. Martha McSally from a GOP primary, and downplayed Bannon\’s role in their own campaign inside a statement.

    "Steve Bannon is of countless high-profile endorsements Dr. Ward has," Ward spokesman Zachery Henry said soon. "The daily parlor intrigue in Washington, D.C., does not even attempt to strengthen the lives from the hardworking people today of the country."

    But other GOP primaries have had little related to Bannon. In Indiana, Reps. Todd Rokita and Luke Messer, along with businessman Mike Braun, were attacking another since the summer. Bannon hadn\’t endorsed any candidate. In Ohio, where Republican Rep. Jim Renacci might enter into the Senate race following Treasurer Josh Mandel\’s decision Friday to decrease out, Bannon never endorsed Mandel or self-funding businessman Mike Gibbons.

    In Wisconsin, Bannon had backed businessman and veteran Kevin Nicholson over state Sen. Leah Vukmir, who may be beloved by grass-roots Republicans within the state. But Nicholson\’s primary backers are Club for Growth and Illinois businessman Richard Uihlein, with the exceptional cash supply won\’t suffer as a consequence of Bannon\’s downfall.

    A similar story is unfolding in Tennessee. While Bannon was supporting Rep. Marsha Blackburn, her backing from Club for Growth means she isn\’t dependent upon him for support. She raised $2 million from the fourth quarter, her campaign said today, compared ith former Rep. Stephen Fincher\’s $1.45 million.

    The only guaranteed loser from Bannon\’s blowup is Bannon himself.

    \”Steve Bannon\’s Fifteen minutes ought to be a case study as to what goes wrong with people once they put themselves through the causes they\’re saying to dedicate yourself to,\” Holmes said.

    Continue Reading


    Cummings hospitalized as wife suspends campaign for governor





    Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) is currently hospitalized after a task to drain an infection, three sources told POLITICO, the most up-to-date setback inside of a string of medical issues which have plagued the longtime lawmaker since a year ago.

    Maya Rockeymoore Cummings, a Democratic policy consultant, suspended her gubernatorial bid in Maryland on Friday, shortly before news surfaced that her husband is at the hospital.

    Story Continued Below

    Soon after POLITICO first reported his hospitalization, Cummings\’ office released an argument saying his health problems were associated with a bacterial infection in the knee.

    "Doctors drained the infection in the minor procedure today. He\’s resting comfortably and expects the full recovery," his office said Friday.

    Cummings was hospitalized and sidelined for a lot of months not too long ago due to heart issues.

    In a press release announcing wants to suspend her campaign, Rockeymoore Cummings cited personal issues but wouldn\’t elaborate.

    \”Making an attractive and direct contribution towards state of Maryland also to our nation was my greatest motivating factor for getting into the public arena. Unfortunately, caused by personal considerations, We\’re suspending my bid for governor of Maryland,\” she said within an email to supporters.

    Multiple sources said Rockeymoore Cummings\’ decision to leave out the race was linked to her husband\’s health concerns. Democratic aides said Cummings was moving slowly ahead of the Christmas break.

    Cummings, 66, was hospitalized last May after what his office described back then as a \”minimally invasive\” heart valve replacement. He was scheduled to revisit work after that but ended up missing many months a result of a post-op infection that kept him clear of Capitol Hill until September.

    Upon his return, Cummings was noticeably slimmer and said he\’d have got to sustain a stricter diet and acquire more sleep. But he brushed aside any notion that he or she wasn\’t competent to fully perform his job.

    Cummings has represented his hometown Baltimore inside your home since 1996. He or she is well-liked and revered among all parties, even while he\’s sparred with Republicans over contentious issues for the reason that top Democrat over the House Oversight Committee.

    Rockeymoore Cummings was one among nine Democrats vying to unseat Republican Gov. Larry Hogan. She was endorsed by EMILY\’s List after she jumped within the race in October. But Rep. Cummings was the gubernatorial candidate\’s biggest single surrogate both publicly plus regards to fundraising. The congressman was listed as being a headliner a great upcoming fundraiser for Rockeymoore Cummings on Sunday.

    Despite the support with the prominent Democratic congressman, Rockeymoore Cummings wasn\’t the irrefutable front-runner however. At the beginning of polling of your Democratic primary, she trailed candidates including former NAACP President Ben Jealous and Prince George\’s County Executive Rushern Baker.

    Despite a considerable primary as well as general Democratic lean of Maryland, Democrats aren\’t as optimistic about unseating Hogan as they are about beating incumbent Republicans in states like Illinois, Boise state broncos, or Maine. That\’s largely because Hogan is popular: An October poll by Morning Consult listed him for the reason that governor while using the second-highest approval near your vicinity, behind only Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker.

    Continue Reading


    GOP senators recommend FBI probe of Trump 'dossier' author Steele





    Two Republican senators have recommended which the FBI pursue a criminal investigation against Christopher Steele – this writer of the disputed Trump-Russia dossier – for the purpose they described as evidence that they made false statements to federal investigators.

    "I cannot take lightly generating a referral for criminal investigation. But, because would with any credible proof a criminal offense unearthed while in our investigations, I\’m obliged to secure that information along on the Justice Department for appropriate review,\” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said in the joint statement with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

    Story Continued Below

    The senators did not provide public evidence to substantiate their request, nevertheless they noted they sent a "classified memorandum" to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray containing the foundation within their request.

    The request isn\’t going to measure the validity of your Steele dossier, nor can it constitute a criminal allegation. "The referral is made for further investigation only," according to the statement.

    Even so, Democrats quickly responded in anger.

    "I wasn\’t consulted concerning this referral nor were all of my Democratic colleagues," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the highest Democrat on Grassley\’s committee. "I do believe this referral is unfortunate since it\’s clearly another effort to deflect attention from what medicine committee\’s main concern: determining whether there is collusion regarding the Trump campaign and Russia to steer the election and whether there were subsequent obstruction of justice."

    One congressional aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the choice by Grassley and Graham to mention Steele towards Justice Department raises an obvious anomaly.

    "These are speaking about DOJ a justice based upon documents DOJ gave them and according to witness testimony into the DOJ," the aide said.

    Steele, an old British intelligence officer, was commissioned in 2016 by research firm Fusion GPS to research President Donald Trump\’s ties to Russia. The dossier he produced, which Trump has derided as fiction, describes a lot of illicit connections between Trump, his business and also the Kremlin.

    Republicans have persistently questioned how the FBI handled the dossier after receiving it in the 2016 campaign, including whether or not it formed the foundation of your surveillance warrant against a Trump campaign associate and whether the FBI independently verified any kind of Steele\’s information.

    Republicans in addition sounded the alarm over reports that Fusion was paid by the Clinton campaign for Steele\’s research, suggesting that Steele\’s work was the merchandise of your partisan smear effort.

    The two senators claim in their letter to obtain seen proof "potential violations" by Steele on the law prohibiting false statements to government officials. These potential violations, they assert, occurred "regarding his distribution of information contained in the dossier."

    Their letter was copied to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the highest Democrat to the Judiciary Committee, and Sens. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), the most notable lawmakers for the Senate Intelligence Committee, and Reps. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the top part lawmakers on the House Intelligence ommittee.

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019