Connect with us


Trump ratchets up defense of immigrant ban as outrage mounts




President Mr . trump on Sunday defended his executive order barring refugees and many legal immigrants from entering the United States, as considered one of his top aides walked back perhaps the measure — signaling confusion and fissures inside the 10-day-old administration.

“America is a proud nation of immigrants and we will always show compassion to those fleeing oppression, but we will do this while protecting our very own citizens and border,” Trump said in the afternoon statement this cited what he known as precedent set by former The president. “To be clear, it’s not a Muslim ban, when the media is falsely reporting. This isn’t about religion — this really is about terror and keeping our country safe.”

Trump – who also spent the time Sunday to accuse Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham of “looking to start out World War III”- and the aides struggled to remain seated on message as global outrage grew above the executive order. The directive, which Trump has cast as the national security imperative, effectively bars entry to america by people covering anything from Iraqi translators to Syrian refugees towards a British Olympian. What’s more, it have been interpreted to apply to legal U.S. permanent residents and many foreigners with multiple nationalities.

Thousands gathered outside of the White House to demand Trump rescind the order Body associated with a amount of protests nationwide. Prominent Republicans and foreign leaders chided Trump, warning your order could backfire by inspiring terrorists. Democrats lunged for your political opening, vowing legislation to repeal the transaction and hinting at lawsuits filed by state attorneys general. Meanwhile, a string of rulings from judges halted the deportation of travelers caught inside the drama, but will also bewildered U.S. officials unsure ways to enforce your order.

The developments underscore the haphazard approach the Trump administration has taken toward featuring its political power. Trump issued the order Friday with little notice to or input within the Department of Homeland Security, nys Department and also other agencies extremely important to implementing it, reported by multiple sources. The order’s complexity left administration lawyers scrambling to interpret it as advocacy groups filed lawsuits.

Trump wouldn’t appear moved by way of the chaos.

In his statement, he stated that Obama had “banned visas for refugees from Iraq for six months” this year. The Obama administration, reacting to intelligence indicating some refugees may have had terrorist ties, had actually instituted additional security checks, severely decreasing the visa issuance process. Trump also noted how the seven countries targeted by his order were also targeted by Obama as potential terror sources.

“We need to do not forget that all of our best allies in the war against Islamic terrorism are Muslims” — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell

    Early Sunday, Trump tweeted: “Our country needs strong borders and extreme vetting, NOW. Look what exactly is happening throughout Europe and, indeed, the whole world – a terrible mess!” obama tweeted early Sunday. Later every day, he dispatched another tweet: “Christians while in the Middle-East are executed in large numbers. We can’t allow this horror to continue!”

    A few hours later, White House Chief of Staff Reince Priebus told NBC News the fact that order may not affect U.S. legal permanent residents “moving forward,” which appeared to be a scaling back in reaction to legal threats. Still, Priebus muddied the waters by saying these people would still face extra screening before they are allowed back into the Country as long as they go to certain countries singled out because of the order.

    “President Trump isn’t happy to have this wrong which explains why he really wants to move ahead quickly and protect Americans,” Priebus said.

    But opponents say the executive order has upended the lives of countless innocent people.


    Ibrahim Lutfi with the exceptional relatives of natives of Sudan. Lutfi said his nephew, Ali Nadeeb, can be a diabetic that has visited a coma at Howard University hospital. Ali’s mother planned to fly towards the U.S. from Qatar to check out her son, but she was not capable of board the plane even with bought a proper visitor’s visa, said Lutfi, who added which he was a U.S. citizen eight years back. He joined a huge selection of people protesting the Trump order at Dulles Air-port on Sunday.

    “It’s her only son,” Lutfi said, holding an illustration using a picture of smiling Ali alongside an alternate picture of him inside of a hospital bed.

    Trump’s executive order, issued Friday, has lots of elements, nonetheless its main features feature an indefinite ban on Syrian refugees, a pause for all those refugee admissions for the Country, and also the temporary suspension of visa holders from seven Muslim-majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen and Libya.

    In his Sunday afternoon statement, Trump remarked that over 40 Muslim-majority countries cant be found singled out in the order. Vehicles noted the suspension of entries from those countries was temporary before the administration undertook an evalutaion and determined within Ninety days that the security safeguards involved in screening those travelers were sufficiently strong enough enough.

    But Trump didn’t point out that the physical conditions bigger placed in his executive order will not be capable of being met by some or it could be every one of the countries. The president wants, as an example, for your countries to express information using the U.S. that will help it vet travelers. However, some from the countries are far too weakly governed, wrecked by war or don’t have diplomatic ties when using the U . s ., defining it as likely the bans on entry from those countries’ citizens can be indefinite. (U.S. officials have long used other measures to vet those citizens.)

    The White House also initially insisted that U.S. legal permanent residents (so-called green-card holders) who hail from those seven countries must get additional screening if they are okay America from abroad, but it really left the character of this screening unclear. In general, people of dual citizenship can also be barred from entering the country for more within their nationalities is produced by the seven countries.

    The order took immediate effect, as well as result was panic and confusion at airports throughout the country Friday and Saturday as some travelers’ legal status changed mid-flight. Those involved included an Iraqi who bought a special U.S. visa for helping American troops, along with legal U.S. permanent residents returning from trips abroad. Lawyers rushed to airports to assist the stranded on Saturday, while protesters did, too, jamming up streets outside major points such as O’Hare Air port in Chicago and New York’s John F. Kennedy Air port.

    Demonstrations continued nationwide Sunday. Hundreds of people streamed into Lafayette Square beyond the White House, waving flags and signs. “No hate! No fear! Refugees are welcome here!” the crowd shouted. At Dulles, protesters cheered mid-day Sunday as passengers arrived at a plane from Saudi Arabia. A number of the travelers, whose exact nationalities were unclear, were obviously distressed. Because they met their relatives, the group shouted “Welcome!” and “Glad you’re here!”

    On the legal front, U.S. officials tried nail across the implications associated with a flurry of rulings from judges country wide that effectively barred customs and border agents from deporting the detained. The 1st ruling began Judge Ann Donnelly, a federal judge in Brooklyn appointed by Obama, on Saturday.

    But even while the Department of Homeland Security promised may well observe the ruling nationwide, including by in green-card holders, there was clearly reports of border agents saying they could carry on and put people on planes leaving the United States.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Sunday spoke with Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, who told Schumer that this administration will abide by the legal court order.”

    “All those still in airports supposed to be admitted,” Schumer tweeted. The Democrat also pledged the minority party will propose legislation to overturn Trump’s executive order.

    Separately, 16 state attorneys general, including those from California and Ny, spoke out contrary to the executive order and warned which they will “use many of the tools your offices to address this unconstitutional order and preserve our nation’s national security and core values.”

    Pressed for comment, a White House official downplayed the judicial impact, pointing towards the Brooklyn ruling particularly. “Saturday’s ruling does not undercut the president’s executive order. All stopped visas will stopped. All halted admissions will continue to be halted. All restricted travel will continue to be prohibited,” operate said. “The order remains into position.”

    “On 1st January in 2010, Her Majesty The Queen helped me a Knight within the Realm. On 27th January, President Donald Trump has recently got me to an alien” — Olympic track champion Mo Farah

    Other Trump aides repeatedly experimented with downplay your situation, arguing that, considering what amount of people regularly go the nation, the numbers affected were relatively small, and thus of little consequence.

    “There’s 325,000 people from foreign countries that traveled into your United states of america yesterday,” White House spokesman Sean Spicer told ABC News on Sunday. “There are 109 people who this actually addressed that have can be found in post-entry from seven countries that we’ve identified.”

    Spicer further refuted reports the administration had blindsided its agencies, claiming the White House told the “people that required to know” for the order ahead. Still, he added, the majority of it was actually kept secret to avoid an unexpected rush of people aiming to reach America.

    “What we couldn’t do was telegraph our position early making sure that people flooded in before that happened, before it went into place,” he explained. “If we were treated to telegraphed that upfront, then that may happen to be a tremendous security problem.”

    Spicer insisted how the executive order does not cost you a ban on Muslims as some critics insist because many Muslim-majority countries have no coverage along with it. But Priebus, talking to NBC News, acknowledged how the quantity of Muslim countries covered by the order can be expanded; while it stands, nations such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, whose citizens have already been included in major terrorist attacks from the Country, aren’t targeted by way of the order.

    Numerous Democratic lawmakers have blasted the transaction, and Trump’s fellow Republicans started to splinter. Some, which include Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Ben Sasse of Nebraska, issued statements saying the transaction goes past an acceptable limit, particularly when it affects legal permanent residents. McCain (R-Arizona) and Graham (R-S.C.) warned within a joint statement that this executive order could bolster recruitment by terrorists who claim free airline hates Muslims.

    “Ultimately, we fear this executive order will become a self-inflicted wound from the deal with terrorism,” McCain and Graham said.

    Trump fought back against McCain and Graham from a list of tweets released surrounding the same time his office issued his statement defending the refugee order.

    “The joint statement of former presidential candidates John McCain & Lindsey Graham is wrong – they are really sadly weak on immigration. The two main…Senators should focus their energies on ISIS, illegal immigration and border security rather than always wanting to start World War III,” Trump wrote of two men that have long disdained him.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell attemptedto strike an account balance in a interview with ABC, insisting that although he opposes religious tests if you are entering america, additional vetting is very little bad idea.

    “We really need to do not forget that each of our best allies within the war against Islamic terrorism are Muslims,” the Kentucky Republican added, indicating that those allies include interpreters in war zones overseas. Trump’s order could specially bar many Iraqi interpreters who’ve applied to an exceptional U.S. visa program.

    Still, Trump’s tweet about Christians undercut many of McConnell’s arguments. The chief order creates a point of directing U.S. officials to provide priority to religious minorities in the event the refugee program resumes, and in some cases that implies Christians. Having said that, although Christians are treated viciously in a number from the countries affected by your order, many Muslims have, too, especially when they are from the minority Shiite branch of Islam. Whatever the case, Trump’s executive order de facto bars Christians from Syria and beyond; two Syrian Christian families that landed in Philadelphia were returned to Qatar following a order.

    Also chiming in on the debate in the United States were foreign leaders. Canada’s Justin Trudeau tweeted that his country remained open to refugees, while German Chancellor Angela Merkel and British Pm Theresa Can also reportedly criticized the transaction.

    British residents were particularly upset as word spread of prominent compatriots who could be affected. Olympic track champion Mo Farah, an english citizen of Somali descent who lives and trains in the nation, wrote a Facebook post in which he worried a policy could separate him from his children. As it’s currently interpreted, if Farah would leave america, he would not be allowed last.

    “On 1st January this current year, Her Majesty The Queen taught me to be a Knight from the Realm. On 27th January, President Donald Trump may have made me an alien,” Farah wrote.


    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading


    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading


    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019