Connect with us


Trump’s Turkey honeymoon sours in days




ISTANBUL – Consensus is rare in Turkey’s fractured society. However, when Mr . trump won the?U.S. elections, Turks along the political spectrum agreed: The brand new American president and Turkey’s ruler Recep Tayyip Erdo?an would get along properly.

How short that lasted. Erdo?an along with his supporters have?gone from confidence?bordering on giddiness?around the prospects for Turkish-American relations to disillusionment in less than a week of Trump inside the White House.

Only weeks ago, government supporters outlined with satisfaction that Trump had defeated his country’s old elites with the ballot box, equally as Erdo?an did?25 years earlier. Government critics saw the similarities at the same time?between, into their view,?two thin-skinned populists which has a penchant for lawsuits who have been very likely to see eye-to-eye.

Erdo?an congratulated Trump on his electoral victory, insisting the fact that president really should visit Turkey “as soon as it can be.” Ministers expressed wish for closer relations; ties between Ankara and Washington became strained beneath National government. Meanwhile, Trump’s?Islamophobic rhetoric was cancelled as campaign talk.

During the campaign period, the Turkish government was less supportive of Trump than strongly as an alternative to Hillary Clinton, who has been thought to be a menace to Turkey’s interests.

As Trump makes good on his pledges, the honeymoon is due an early on end. “We are waiting to observe what Mr. Trump will say for the Middle East,” Erdo?an?told reporters yesterday. “At the minute, some language concerning the Middle East is reaching our ear, plus its frankly disturbing.”

While Erdo?an could not elaborate, he hasn’t been alone in expressing his dismay while using new administration. When Trump forged ahead regarding his “Muslim ban,” suspending visas for all those born in seven Muslim-majority nations, Turkish ministers were quick to criticize the transaction.

“Regional issues cannot be solved by closing the doors on people,” said Binali Y?ld?r?m, Turkey’s pm, on a press conference along with his British counterpart Theresa May on Saturday. “You can take shape a wall. Nevertheless it’s no solution. That wall should come down similar to the Berlin Wall.”

    Short honeymoon

    Disagreement was probably inevitable. Turkey’s ruling party is rooted in Islamism and takes pride in giving a voice to religious conservatives. Erdo?an would rather cast himself as a representative and protector of Sunni Muslims throughout the Middle East; Ankara hosts exiled persons in the Syrian opposition along with other rebel groups, along with Hamas and Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.

    Trump, however, hit out at Muslims and Islam throughout his campaign, proposing really not a “Muslim ban” and also a “Muslim registry.” Within the summer, Erdo?an essential the Republican nominee’s name to get removed from Istanbul’s Trump Towers. Apart from that, barely a thing of criticism was heard in Ankara’s corridors of power.

    During the campaign period, the Turkish government was less supportive of Trump than strongly against Hillary Clinton, who had previously been deemed a threat to Turkey’s interests. The Democratic nominee’s firm support for?the Syrian Kurdish YPG militia put her at odds with Ankara. The YPG, widely regarded the most efficient force within the combat with the Islamic State, has ties into the militant Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), that’s waged a three-decade insurgency against the Turkish state.

    On surface of that, Clinton’s campaign received donations from supposed supporters of Fethullah G


    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for "creative" strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading


    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading


    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019