Connect with us


French left’s Hamon faces 007




PARIS – Former French education minister Benoit Hamon could barely deliver his victory speech Sunday for those joyful hooting from his supporters after he nabbed the Socialists’ presidential nomination.

By Monday morning, though, cold reality acquired over.

Hamon faces a very steep path to the presidency, with current polls showing they would not break through to the election’s runoff round. To ignore odds, Hamon must install himself as being the left’s dominant candidate over two other contenders who definitely are polling higher and show no manifestation of quitting: former economy minister Emmanuel Macron and left-wing firebrand Jean-Luc Melenchon.

As if this weren’t sufficiently, vehicles faces the urgent task of saving his personal Socialist Party, more divided than in the past after an acrimonious campaign. Hamon and former prime minister Manuel Valls ran on radically opposing visions, together with the latter?accusing him of advertising impossible dreams.?Many Valls supporters said we can not consider supporting Hamon, and the ex-premier himself said he cannot defend his opponent’s platform in a very general election.

Adapting his program really should not be a lot trouble for Hamon – if he truly wants to run for president, and not only just become “King within the Left.”

Now both men, both career socialists, must mend fences quickly to prevent the threat of leftist allies fleeing to?Macron’s camp. Already on Sunday night, they met for that handshake and pow-wow at party headquarters go over how Hamon would definitely tackle the?immediate threat of socialist bigwigs rallying behind Macron.

Hamon vs Macron

On Monday, Valls’ camp was at a conciliatory mood. Campaign spokesman Philippe Doucet hinted in a possible peace deal if Hamon established that he had adopt really Valls’ ideas. “The presidential program will be built around Hamon’s program but it must get broader in order to evolve from a primary program to fit with the presidency,” Doucet told RTL radio.

Adapting his program must not be a lot of damage to Hamon – if he truly wants to run for president, and not become “King in the Left” as numerous opponents have suggested. He was getting in touch with Valls backers on Sunday, peppering his victory speech with references to “the threat of Islamist terrorism” and warning about global “destabilization” because of U.S. President Mr . trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    But many Valls backers previously comprised their brains. On Monday, a grouping of Valls-supporting Socialist MPs calling themselves “the reformers” gathered go over their options. A few them, Alain Calmette and Dominique Baert, announced they will is joining Macron, with all the latter telling a neighborhood newspaper he preferred “cousin” Macron for the “false brother” Hamon.

    On Monday, Macron booster Richard Ferrand urged?”all supporters” to come back aboard while warning how the former minister wouldn’t water down his campaign.?”All supporters are welcome, although what should be understood is the fact we mean to follow our course,” Ferrand told France Inter. “Supporting us is not to mean changing what we are attempting to do.”

    Thankfully for Macron, they have not explained his plans in enough?detail to create insurmountable conflicts with Valls.

    On one issue of possible discord, namely Valls’ embrace of aggressive state secularism to combat “political Islam,” Macron has never said much in his campaign. But the two men could still find loads of mutual understanding inside a tough-on-terrorism security plan.

    For Valls, avoiding a clash with Macron makes political sense. By discreetly supporting Macron, Valls would position himself to be the?leader on the reformist center-left bloc that is a healthy governing partner for Macron. Electrical systems, rallying fully behind Hamon makes Valls look subordinate, nixing his chances of profiting from the Socialist Party’s collapse.

    Melenchon vs Hamon

    If Macron poses a threat to Hamon, then Melenchon poses a much more deadly one.

    Better known, more charismatic and more politically radical, Melenchon launched his presidential campaign months ago, building momentum with big rallies in addition to a broad following for his town-hall style debates on Youtube. His supporters attacked Hamon through the socialist primary being a party apparatchik who offered a quasi-duplicate of Melenchon’s platform without its outsider appeal.

    Following Hamon’s clear victory, however, Melenchon signaled a strategic halt to hostilities. Within a Facebook?post, he insisted that he or she and Hamon “shared language” on many issues facing France. He also vowed to stay for “good coffee” with Hamon, though he stopped in need of addressing Sunday’s offer to join his campaign.

    Even so, on?closer inspection, Hamon and Melenchon may make incompatible. Warriors may be a populist who relishes attacking France’s establishment and trampling around the Socialist Party, which he was in the past a participant. Hamon, to amass, is really a pure socialist product whose campaign would not channel anger or perhaps a desire for revolution like Melenchon’s, but a dreamier need to have new ideas. Across the next month or so, both the men will grapple for supremacy over the left, hoping to absorb the other’s campaign on friendly terms – or bludgeon them into irrelevancy.

    When considering attacking, Melenchon has more experience.


    Black caucus chairman pushes to censure Trump over ‘shithole’ remark





    Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Cedric Richmond on Thursday introduced a solution to censure President Donald Trump over what he contends would be the president\’s racist rhetoric referring to El Salvador, Haiti and African nations as \”shithole countries.\”

    The resolution – who has much more than 130 co-sponsors, including House Democratic leaders – calls over the House to publicly state its support for any nations Trump disparaged, censure and condemn the president for his statements, and demand he retract his comments and apologize.

    Story Continued Below

    At a news conference announcing the resolution alongside House Judiciary Committee ranking member Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) as well as other Democrats, Richmond (D-La.) said Trump\’s controversial comments \”should have not been made\” and \”were factually inaccurate.\”

    Richmond conceded, however, the resolution isn\’t \”privileged,\” meaning House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) might need to say yes to carry it in order with the chamber to keep a vote. It\’s almost certain Ryan will not likely do this.

    \”If he doesn\’t, we then will be at other ways to just make a vote on there,\” Richmond told reporters. \”But the facts from the matter is definitely the speaker should bring it up. In the event that he doesn\’t, establishing is enabling and recurring to allow obama to perpetuate this hateful rhetoric, as well as at certain point – whether you agree or disagree – I believe this is the speaker\’s obligation to safeguard the dignity of the property.\”

    If Ryan will not allow a vote, Richmond said he among others would hunt for “creative” strategies to force one.

    Like most Republican leaders, Ryan hasn\’t said much for the president\’s reported comments, though he did acknowledge the other day that they are \”very unfortunate\” and \”unhelpful.\” For Richmond, however, that wasn\’t enough.

    \”It\’s unfortunate when I miss my bus. Or it\’s unfortunate in the event the airlines lose my luggage,\” he was quoted saying. \”But when the president of america decides to Africa, Haiti and El Salvador which he used, which isn\’t unfortunate. That is wrong. That\’s disgusting. That is definitely hurtful. There are a variety of words because of it, but unfortunate\’s undertake and don\’t.\”

    Continue Reading


    Ryan's 2017 fundraising haul: $44 million





    House Speaker Paul Ryan raised more than $44 million in 2017, an off-year record to get a House leader – a financial haul Republicans hope will shore up vulnerable GOP members in what\’s shaping up to often be a tough midterm cycle for Republicans.

    In a final quarter, Ryan raised $4.8 million, his political operation will announce Thursday – down from $6.7 million during the third quarter.

    Story Continued Below

    The infusion of greenbacks is a follower of Republicans passed a tax reform law last December, which GOP members said would drive support among voters and donors. But also in 2018, Republicans must defend its 24-seat majority spanning a broad battlefield, while President Donald Trump\’s approval ratings stay in the bottom 40s and Democrats hold a broad bring success the generic ballot. Nearly 24 retirements, including California Reps. Ed Royce and Darrell Issa latest research by, will force Republicans to invest more heavily to protect these open seats.

    In 2017, Ryan transferred $32 million to the National Republican Campaign Committee, which announced a unique record-breaking off-year total with $85 million raised in the last year. Ryan also transferred $1.7 million on to GOP members, as well as hosting 49 fundraisers for members.

    "This eye-popping number is usually a testament to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans, as well as the agenda them to led your strugle on in 2017," said Kevin Seifert, executive director of Team Ryan, the speaker\’s fundraising committee.

    Continue Reading


    Bannon won't testify again on Russia Thursday





    Former White House adviser Steve Bannon declined House Russia investigators\’ request to go back for a second interview Thursday, telling lawmakers through his lawyer their own obtain him to go back just 2 days after his first appearance was "unreasonable."

    "The Committee\’s subpoena provides require Mr. Bannon\’s appearance for that second deposition [Thursday] at 2pm. That may be plainly insufficient time for me to undertake precisely what the Committee has asked," Bannon\’s attorney William Burck wrote within a Wednesday letter to store intelligence committee leaders obtained by POLITICO.

    Story Continued Below

    Instead, Burck told committee leaders that the former senior aide to President Donald Trump would return after reaching an accommodation when using the White House to make sure his testimony doesn\’t violate executive privilege.

    On Tuesday, Bannon-citing instructions from your Trump administration-refused to reply Republican and Democrats\’ questions on his amount of the White House, the post-election transition team and in some cases about his conversations with the president after he was fired from his post in August. His stonewalling infuriated persons in both parties, who subpoenaed him immediately. But despite the subpoena, Bannon declined to reply to their questions.

    Burck\’s letter told the committee\’s top Russia investigators, Rep. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), that Bannon remains ready to answer the committee\’s questions-but after striking an understanding together with the White House while on an acceptable scope of questioning.

    "There isn\’t any conceivable solution to talk to the White House Mr. Bannon\’s time using the transition and also the White House, obtain their thoughts about the knowledge he previously provide, communicate those views back to the Committee, relay the Committee\’s views time for the White House, and then negotiate or facilitate a binding agreement amongst the Committee along with the White House from the time allotted by the Committee\’s subpoena," Burck wrote.

    Committee members at the moment are weighing calling hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for avoiding their questions. They\’ve noted that White House lawyers haven\’t formally invoked executive privilege-they just have suggested that Bannon\’s testimony might implicate it.

    White House officials have argued that it is customary for Congress to coordinate the scope of the questions with current and former officials to stop violating privileged information.

    But GOP and Democratic lawmakers have questioned this argument, suggesting they see no reasonable interpretation of executive privilege that might preclude Bannon from discussing his time over the transition team, that is before Trump was president.

    Burck indicated that the committee didn\’t have use of White House and transition documents that has to be relevant precursors to the questions for Bannon and suggested lawmakers and Bannon would require time for them to produce them and review them before Bannon\’s next interview.

    "There are lots of lawyers over the Committee plus the Staff, and i also could well be surprised as long as they believed it becomes anything in addition to unprofessional even unethical should be expected to depose a witness that has did not have possibility for review relevant documents," he said.

    Burck also indicated a potential disconnect between committee staff and lawmakers. He revealed that he had informed the employees of the committee, chaired by Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the White House "may not permit Mr. Bannon to discuss his in time the transition and the White House unless an accommodation was agreed between your Committee plus the White House."

    "Staff raised no objection to the telltale restrictions in any of such conversations," he said. "The main objection came yesterday within the Members who appear not to have been informed by Staff about our prior conversations."

    Continue Reading


    Copyright © 2019